Contrast at Work

[AnthroHeart]

Post Removed

[JoshC]

Questioner: For the general development of the reader of this book, could you state some of the practices or exercises to perform to produce an acceleration toward the Law of One?

Ra: I am Ra.

Exercise One. This is the most nearly centered and useable within your illusion complex. The moment contains love. That is the lesson/goal of this illusion or density. The exercise is to consciously see that love in awareness and understanding distortions. The first attempt is the cornerstone. Upon this choosing rests the remainder of the life-experience of an entity. The second seeking of love within the moment begins the addition. The third seeking empowers the second, the fourth powering or doubling the third. As with the previous type of empowerment, there will be some loss of power due to flaws within the seeking in the distortion of insincerity. However, the conscious statement of self to self of the desire to seek love is so central an act of will that, as before, the loss of power due to this friction is inconsequential.

Exercise Two. The universe is one being. When a mind/body/spirit complex views another mind/body/spirit complex, see the Creator. This is an helpful exercise.

Exercise Three. Gaze within a mirror. See the Creator.

Exercise Four. Gaze at the creation which lies about the mind/body/spirit complex of each entity. See the Creator.

The foundation or prerequisite of these exercises is a predilection towards what may be called meditation, contemplation, or prayer. With this attitude, these exercises can be processed. Without it, the data will not sink down into the roots of the tree of mind, thus enabling and ennobling the body and touching the spirit.

Peace, Love, Light and Namasté

[unity100]

I understand that just being in the flow allows me to hold a certain vibration that might be higher than other vibrations. Is this really all I need to do? Maybe what they are doing is right for them. Do I need to send vibrations specifically to individuals, or just hold a general light and hold no thoughts?

i say go with your flow and do the precise thing whenever you feel that that precise thing is needed to be done.

if your environment is too incompatible with you, you may need to change your environment, your life etc, however.

[Namaste]

My experience is probably similar to many others.
Some here at work talk about how drunk they got, like they drank a 12 pack and passed out. This is their way of creator experiencing itself.

I get my own buzz on energy. Not even meditation per se, but just reclining and feeling the energy flowing.

I'm not going to judge here, though I can't say exactly if one is more constructive than another.

I understand that just being in the flow allows me to hold a certain vibration that might be higher than other vibrations. Is this really all I need to do? Maybe what they are doing is right for them. Do I need to send vibrations specifically to individuals, or just hold a general light and hold no thoughts?

You can send love and light to them individually if you wish, follow your instincts. Holding your own vibration is the key as you mentioned, as when doing so, you're affecting others in a positive way.

If you can observe, and even take part in, the kind of conversations that feel 'less spiritual' to you, then your ability to consciously respond to catalyst is in good balance. As long as you are being honest with yourself, of course.

[AnthroHeart]

Thank you all. Namaste, that makes sense about being able to join in with conversations, and not falling to one side or the other in terms of composure. My work is actually very compatible. It gives me freedom to explore my spirituality. Just was curious about when some seem to exhibit destructive behavior. Of course, I have my own things to deal with, so I am no worse or better than anyone else.

I am hoping decisions get easier when part of a social memory complex. Not that they're really that hard now, but I always look for the most fluid choices.

[Questioner]

GW, I feel you are exploring your own path, and they are exploring their path.

Your path is one of delighting in the flow of life, and also sometimes working at a particular job.

Their path is one of discovering how to erase awareness, and also sometimes working at the job next to yours.

If you have a sense of rapport, you could comment about your love of life and not seeing the point of erasing awareness. The comment itself may or may not make any sense to people on that path of part-time oblivion. You don't have to say anything, though. If they are supposed to leave that path of oblivion in this lifetime, and joy you in simply being high on life, the Creator has more than one way to reach them.

The thread about Kristy's family troubles had a lot of comment about respecting negative paths others choose to travel, even if we don't understand any purpose for those seeming detours.

You might find it worthwhile to consider the Michael Teachings comments about soul age: http://www.michaelteachings.com/soul_ages.html Perhaps you are at a level of discovering a richness of color and shading in life, while they are at a level of figuring out how to make the on and off switch work. If so, there's nothing wrong with that but probably also not much common ground for learning together.

[seejay21]

You might find it worthwhile to consider the Michael Teachings comments about soul age: http://www.michaelteachings.com/soul_ages.html Perhaps you are at a level of discovering a richness of color and shading in life, while they are at a level of figuring out how to make the on and off switch work. If so, there's nothing wrong with that but probably also not much common ground for learning together.

Thanks for the link!

[Questioner]

Thanks for the link!

You're welcome, Seejay.

I have extremely positive feelings about the Michael material. I've found it to be a very inspiring and practical approach to personality and psychology. I'm not sure if I fully understand, let alone agree, with the more metaphysical ideas from Michael about "cadres" of souls. Except for that, I don't personally see any contradictions between Michael and the Law of One material.

I respect the moderators' wishes that the point of this forum is to gather based on the channeled material brought forth through L/L Research. So I haven't gone into more in depth discussion about Michael except where it seems immediately relevant. If I knew of another forum to discuss a broader range of channeled material, this is one of my favorite sources outside of LLR. (I also really like Bashar and much of the Galactic Messages site.)

As always please use only what appeals to you, makes sense to you, and helps you. I want to be sure that I don't wander too far off the LLR foundation for the conversations here.

[AnthroHeart]

Awesome, thanks for the Michael link. I had seen that before but couldn't recall the place.