03-12-2015, 05:01 AM
You seem to be pretty versed in negative tactics it seems, that's disconcerting. Of course, you will insist your explanation is correct...
I associate free will with the fool. Sometimes the fool is misled. This isn't an atrocity, it is part of the fool learning wisdom and discernment. With no freedom to be misled, we would all be held by the hands and guided through every action. Some desire this, others don't. The freedom to mislead is a puzzle piece to the freedom to be misled. Without our fallibility, we would not expand and grow. Without our freedom to be infringed upon, we would never learn to protect ourselves, or the value of our free will. That is what the dynamic between negative and positive reveals - self-value and value of other selves.
It appears to me that you simply have a fear of being mislead. It seems you place the positive purely in the role of the victim, suggesting the individual would have no influence over the manifestation of their own life events.
I associate free will with the fool. Sometimes the fool is misled. This isn't an atrocity, it is part of the fool learning wisdom and discernment. With no freedom to be misled, we would all be held by the hands and guided through every action. Some desire this, others don't. The freedom to mislead is a puzzle piece to the freedom to be misled. Without our fallibility, we would not expand and grow. Without our freedom to be infringed upon, we would never learn to protect ourselves, or the value of our free will. That is what the dynamic between negative and positive reveals - self-value and value of other selves.
It appears to me that you simply have a fear of being mislead. It seems you place the positive purely in the role of the victim, suggesting the individual would have no influence over the manifestation of their own life events.