02-24-2021, 04:06 PM
(02-24-2021, 02:57 PM)Agua Wrote:(02-24-2021, 12:55 PM)Patrick Wrote: I think they have kept [danger of corruption] in mind at all times and successfully threaded around the pitfalls inherent in doing this work.
Interesting perspective!
In things outside the Ra contact done by LLR, I'm not fully clear on the aim and nature of the activity -- and so how to view the greater whole, and so the question of corruption as things have shaped up over time.
I think a "soft neutralization" may have happened, where the material was never corrupted, but its practical significance was lessened. Don Elkins carried a big piece of the key to the nature of it all and really making the most of the inspiration, and the loss of him was not compensated for in the continuation of activities. The narrowing of focus of LLR as a result created a vacuum filled by, e.g. the Cassiopaean Experiment.
Back in 2009, the kind of discussion in this thread was not allowed on this forum. LLR tried to generally keep B4 pure by limiting the focus narrowly, preventing discussion of and comparison with other channeled sources, etc. The narrowness of focus was later given up, and then a new general challenge became a diluted focus in the absence of having any wider examination and synthesis connected to the heart of it all.
Basically, I think LLR made itself and B4 irrelevant for many by setting too insular and self-limiting a focus. A decade later, while they change approach, people immersed in alternatives which have long claimed to do right what the original LLR trio did wrong, now have enough information for a clearer new look, in potential, with effort to examine stuff. (I used to think LKJ's criticisms were reasonable and showed how the Cassiopaean Experiment took on the next challenge of growing into a new paradigm, while others stepped away from trying to do so. But then, it turns out they replaced one self-harming imbalance with another which has different negative consequences.)