05-25-2021, 07:22 AM
(05-24-2021, 11:12 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote: For thousands of years, religious and spiritual beliefs have often included a transformation to come soon, from the miserable and wretched present (in which people have had enough of suffering) to a nicer future state of things. For thousands of years, history has moved on without such a transformation occuring. What's the difference now, compared to very similar beliefs and attitudes throughout history, where people also had all kinds of ideas about why they were right when people before them had been wrong?
Eric Hoffer wrote an insightful book on the nature of mass movements all the way back in 1951, and he stated that the devaluing of the present in favour of a more glorious (but abstract) future is an important key point that most movements(religions, political mass movements) share.
I'd argue that spiritual paths do the opposite before they get corrupted and turned into a religion.
Hoffer also has interesting chapters on how vague doctrines become effective in such movements and who exactly gets drawn and fed by them. He even explains how they radically change in their outlook and methods over time. I highly recommend reading his book.
Asolsutsesvyl Wrote:The very first session in 1994, for example, predicted that 94% of humanity would be totally consumed by 4D STS aliens around the year 2007. 2004 came the Cassiopaea is now Orion session. 2014 came an interview with the 5D Caesar who is the real 5D Jesus who projects his soul as a discarnate helper to all who pray, according to the Cassiopaeans. For now I leave this with the following question, "What is this crap?", concerning the Cassiopaeans.
You forgot the best part. Early on, it was announced that riding the wave, there would be a massive fleet of Nephilim on three immensely huge space ships carrying 12 million each, coming from Orion and headed our way.
Asolsutsesvyl Wrote:There's a few good things to find in the Cassiopaea material here and there, but mostly I've lost interest in it. Later on I'll perhaps post the gist of some good nuggets.
See, that could be really interesting. I think you've done a good job showing how nutty LKJ has become, especially after the period Montalk left. But since some of us are quite familiar with the old material from the 90s, we could discuss some of the more salient metaphysical points they offered and how they might be of practical use. After all, the point of the RW article is to enlighten people that might otherwise fall prey to the Cassiopaean groupthink and to allow an alternative viewpoint that wouldn't be allowed on the Cassiopaean forums. But for recovering ex-groupies, it might be cool to find out what was actually useful in the older material and whether or not it can be seperated from the LKJ personality cult.