Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Portal

    Latest Threads
    A Comprehensive Analysis ...
    Forum: Science & Technology
    Last Post: the
    08-06-2022, 09:25 AM
    » Replies: 495
    » Views: 454,643
    The mysterious nature of ...
    Forum: Olio
    Last Post: Confused
    08-06-2022, 07:14 AM
    » Replies: 16,731
    » Views: 8,379,549
    How genuine is your inten...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 03:53 AM
    » Replies: 28
    » Views: 66,426
    Choosing polarities, surv...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 12:07 AM
    » Replies: 25
    » Views: 33,928
    what music are you listen...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: schubert
    08-05-2022, 11:51 PM
    » Replies: 3,650
    » Views: 2,675,338
    What youtube video are yo...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 08:24 PM
    » Replies: 502
    » Views: 327,090
    Are you going to take the...
    Forum: Health & Diet
    Last Post: zedro
    08-05-2022, 07:17 PM
    » Replies: 2,075
    » Views: 1,479,104
    Daily Q'uote
    Forum: L/L Research Channeling Archives
    Last Post: omcasey
    08-05-2022, 03:43 PM
    » Replies: 2,593
    » Views: 1,916,185
    what movie did you last w...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 09:11 AM
    » Replies: 386
    » Views: 512,871
    All-Time Favourite Hits o...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 04:20 AM
    » Replies: 39
    » Views: 42,527

    Search Forums

    (Advanced Search)

      Law of One & Language
    Posted by: jivatman - 06-03-2012, 09:06 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (5)

    I am interested in one particular quote in the Law of One:

    Quote:Questioner: How did the users of these sounds, Sanskrit and Hebrew, determine what these sounds were?

    Ra: I am Ra. In the case of the Hebrew that entity known as Yahweh aided this knowledge through impression upon the material of genetic coding which became language, as you call it.

    In the case of Sanskrit the sound vibrations are pure due to the lack of previous, what you call, alphabet or letter-naming. Thus the sound vibration complexes seemed to fall into place as from the Logos. This was a more, shall we say, natural or unaided situation or process.

    I'm going to begin a treatment of what the underlined portion means:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit#Writing_system
    From Wikipedia:
    Quote:The pre-Classical form of Sanskrit is known as Vedic Sanskrit, with the language of the Rigveda being the oldest and most archaic stage preserved, its oldest core dating back to as early as 1500 BCE.[6] This qualifies Rigvedic Sanskrit as one of the oldest attestations of any Indo-Iranian language, and one of the earliest attested members of the Indo-European language family, the family which includes English and most European languages.[7]

    Ok, so Possibly the original Indo-European language. The vedas and other texts were preserved orally only for over a thousand years...

    Quote:Sanskrit was spoken in an oral society, and the oral tradition was maintained through the development of early classical Sanskrit literature.[30] Writing was not introduced to India until after Sanskrit had evolved into the Prakrits; when it was written, the choice of writing system was influenced by the regional scripts of the scribes. Therefore, Sanskrit has no native script of its own.[2] As such, virtually all of the major writing systems of South Asia have been used for the production of Sanskrit manuscripts.
    Quote:The earliest known inscriptions in Sanskrit date to the 1st century BCE.[32] They are in the Brahmi script, which was originally used for Prakrit, not Sanskrit.[33] It has been described as a "paradox" that the first evidence of written Sanskrit occurs centuries later than that of the Prakrit languages which are its linguistic descendants.[32][34] When Sanskrit was written down, it was first used for texts of an administrative, literary or scientific nature. The sacred texts were preserved orally, and were set down in writing, "reluctantly" (according to one commentator), and at a comparatively late date.[33]

    There was an extreme reluctance to using a writing system at all, and various scripts were taken from other languages, all this in order to preserve the purity of the sound. A language older than 1500 BC, possibly the oldest systematized spoken language, had no writing system all until 100 BC, when scripts were taken from other languages.

    One more thing I'd like to add is that Panini, who lived in 600 BC, wrote probably the best book on grammar and language rules ever written, such that language theory experts today use Sanskrit from panini terms heavily, and that Sanskrit is considered, grammatically, the most perfect language and is being investigated for use in creating computer languages.

    Now I'd like to treat another language, Chinese, because in many ways it's the opposite of Sanskrit.
    Quote:Written Chinese (Chinese: 中文; pinyin: zhōngwén) comprises Chinese characters (漢字 / 汉字 hànzì) used to represent the Chinese language, and the rules about how they are arranged and punctuated. Chinese characters do not constitute an alphabet or a compact syllabary. Rather, the writing system is roughly logosyllabic; that is, a character generally represents one syllable of spoken Chinese and may be a word on its own or a part of a polysyllabic word. The characters themselves are often composed of parts that may represent physical objects, abstract notions,[1] or pronunciation.[2]

    Various current Chinese characters have been traced back to the late 商 Shāng Dynasty about 1200–1050 BC,[3][4][5] but the process of creating characters is thought to have begun some centuries earlier.[6] After a period of variation and evolution, Chinese characters were standardized under the 秦 Qín dynasty (221–206 BC).[7] Over the millennia, these characters have evolved into well-developed styles of Chinese calligraphy.[8]

    In Chinese it's the script itself that is ancient and revered, It's logo-syllabic, that is the script primarily represents meanings and not sounds...

    Quote:The Chinese had no uniform phonetic transcription system until the mid-20th century, although enunciation patterns were recorded in early rime books and dictionaries. Early Indian translators, working in Sanskrit and Pali, were the first to attempt to describe the sounds and enunciation patterns of Chinese in a foreign language. After the 15th century, the efforts of Jesuits and Western court missionaries resulted in some rudimentary Latin transcription systems, based on the Nanjing Mandarin dialect.

    Hah! see, for Chinese there was no phonetic, or spoken transcription until later... and guess who attempted it? The Indians of course!

    All right, all right. So what is the significance of all this?

    Well, we now understand what is meant by Spoken Sanskrit being purer or "seemed to fall into place as from the Logos." So, it would seem, Language is the superior language for Mantra usage or verbal contexts.

    But my deduction here... is that for Chinese, it is the script itself that is purer or "seemed to fall in place from the logos". So it may be that if one wants to use visualize letters in meditation or in a yantra, Chinese may be better because it's script is purer.




    Print this item

      we are personally called
    Posted by: Plenum - 05-30-2012, 11:34 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (30)

    Quote:7.6 Questioner: About how many entities at present on planet Earth are calling for your services?


    Ra: I am called personally by 352,000. The Confederation, in its entire spectrum of entity-complexes, is called by 632,000,000 of your mind/body/spirit complexes. These numbers have been simplified.

    this was in 1981 ... and the earth's population was about 4.5 bil.

    I think I might put in a personal call lol

    non-trance of course ...

    Print this item

      the various layers of mind (cosmic ---> conscious)
    Posted by: Plenum - 05-30-2012, 10:56 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (5)

    I have been investigating the MIND just recently, and thought a diagram might sum up my thoughts on it. As always, Ra supplied the bulk of the material.

    here is the drawing:

    [Image: YNezA.png]

    ordinarily, we only experience the top layer, the Conscious Mind. But this layer has many inputs that pass through the Veil (semi-permeable).

    the first level is:

    Personal Unconscious: this is the storehouse of everything that we have experienced, felt, thought, or dreamt. Under HYPNOSIS, we can recall every Detail, every Scent, or every Memory. NOTHING is ever forgotten by the Personal Unconscious.

    the second level is:

    Racial Mind -

    Quote:91.6 Questioner: What is the origin of the planetary or racial mind?

    Ra: I am Ra. This racial or planetary mind is, for this Logos, a repository of biases remembered by the mind/body/spirit complexes which have enjoyed the experience of this planetary influence.

    Quote:91.7 Therefore, although this Akashic, planetary, or racial mind is indeed a root of mind it may be seen in sharp differentiation from the deeper roots of mind which are not a function of altering memory, if you will.

    Quote:31.16 Questioner: I just need to know if this then works through the racial memory to infect the entire population in some way. Is it a— Does that sort of thing happen?

    Ra: I am Ra. The racial memory contains all that has been experienced.

    - -

    the third level is:

    Archetypal Mind
    Quote:90.17 Please recall the definition of the archetypical mind as the repository of those refinements to the cosmic or all-mind made by this particular Logos and peculiar only to this Logos. Thus it may be seen as one of the roots of mind, not the deepest but certainly the most informative in some ways.

    - -

    now, one of the great tasks in becoming the Creator is to KNOW THYSELF. But how can you know yourself if you are only dwelling at the level of the Conscious Mind, without understanding all the influences that are inpouring into your experience?

    Quote:83.15 Questioner: Is the veil supposed to be what I would call semi-permeable?

    Ra: I am Ra. The veil is indeed so.

    Ra speaks much about the 'roots of mind' http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=r...s=1&st=all

    Print this item

      What is a Planet?
    Posted by: Siren - 05-27-2012, 11:54 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (30)

    What is a planet? Have you ever really thought about it? This is a subject that is often overlooked, but delving further into it may prove quite fruitful.

    I'll open up with some quotes from the Ra Material:

    Quote:Questioner: Are there any sub-sub-Logoi that are found in our planetary system that are “sub” to our sun?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

    Questioner: Would you give me an example of what I will call a sub-sub-Logos?

    Ra: I am Ra. One example is your mind/body/spirit complex.

    Quote:Questioner: Then the planet which we walk upon here would be some form of sub-sub-Logos. Is this correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. A planetary entity is so named only as Logos if It is working in harmonic fashion with entities or mind/body complexes upon Its surface or within Its electromagnetic field.

    This has somewhat puzzled me for a long while. It would seem a planetary entity is an entity because of the mind/body/spirit complexes that dwell upon or within it, thus "entitizing" it.

    This then begets the question: Is a planet not an entity unto itself? But perhaps in order to answer that question we must first address another: Just what is a planet exactly (other than a chemical ball floating in space)?

    When most people think of the planet, they generally think of nature. By nature they mean to imply flora and fauna; but principally vegetation, and of course earth, soil, rocks mountains, valleys, meadows, rivers and lakes and oceans. But are these not simply 1st density (earth, water, etc) and 2nd density entities (vegetal and animal)? Then... just what is the planet?

    All the primordial elements/materials a planetary sphere is made of are 1st density entities. So is a planet a sub-sub-Logos or are the entities inhabiting it the sub-sub-Logoi that make the planet a sub-sub-Logos? That there is a relationship between the planet and its inhabitants is beyond question; but are the planetary inhabitants subject to the planet, or... is it the other way around?

    Quote:It is only when the planetary sphere begins harmonically interacting with mind/body complexes, and more especially mind/body/spirit complexes, that planetary spheres take on distortions due to the thought complexes of entities interacting with the planetary entity.

    And remember this again...

    Quote:A planetary entity is so named only as Logos if It is working in harmonic fashion with entities or mind/body complexes upon Its surface or within Its electromagnetic field.

    How is it that a planet becomes either positively or negatively polarized (in the sense of service/seeking)? It is not the choice of the planet (as if the planet was something else, separate, or "other than"), it is the collective choice of its 3rd density inhabitants (sub-sub-Logoi)!

    I conclude then, that the planet is not the orb one sees floating in the middle of space; it is rather a singular collective unit/entity composed of various mind/body/spirit complexes in their various densities of experience. It is, in a manner of speaking, a school, a theater, a playground wherein all entities participating and playing in it are, inexorably, all bound and connected to each other, in a very literal way. Thus the "fate" of a planet cannot be decided individually, but collectively; or at least, in terms of percentages—that is, when sufficiently "ripe," the planet becomes either a positively- or negatively-oriented sphere based on the overall orientation of polarity of its mind/body/spirit complexes. That is why, in the case of this particular planetary sphere, despite the apparent negativity on the planet, the underlying preference of service of its inhabitants tends towards the positive; thus spiraling the planetary entity into positive 4D instead of negative—since the truly negatively-polarizing entities are far fewer in number and not sufficient, in contrast with the rest of the population, to produce a negative planetary graduation.

    (I believe the reason why people think the planet is negative is due to the "confusion"—or indecisiveness, or lack of desire/intensity to choose and align with a preferred form of service—of the greater portion of the population; those that remain "luke-warm.")

    Another thing I wanted to briefly touch upon was the subject of the planet being seen as a mother ("mother Earth," "mother nature," etc). Since early childhood I've heard people refer to planet Earth as a "she." This has never felt right to me; the "humanization" or attribution of human-like qualities to planetary and celestial bodies.

    I understand the "femininity" of the planet, but not in the way most people do. The planet is negative in its nature (electromagnetically-speaking), and the negative quality is feminine (being attractive, receptive). It is within the planetary environment that matter begins to coalesce and form; the planet being, in a very literal sense, a womb.

    Furthermore (and perhaps even more revealing), matter derives from the Latin materia ("physical substance from which something is made"). The relationship is obvious: maternal, material, matter; and even matrix (which literally means uterus, womb). And while I'm at it, I might as well throw this in: womb > woman.

    And what is (hu)man? Isn't it said that man was formed out of earth, molded out of primordial clay, and that to dust he shall return? The very word human is related to humus, directly referring to earth, soil. And what about "Adam," the first man? It comes from the Hebrew adamah, which literally means "ground." Further, homo and hominis and homunculus are very much related too, if you care to investigate further.

    But I digress. We understand that creation is the recapitulation in reverse of Intelligent Infinity in experiencing and exploring Itself and re-living Its own "awakening." The recapitulation has its beginnings in the 1st density in a planetary sphere. The planetary sphere (1st density) serves then as the womb/matrix/mother for the developing body/mind/spirit complexes that grow in it (which are literally formed out of its own primordial elements), 2D, leading to 3D, and so on.

    Now, that being said, I turn around and ask you again: What is a planet?

    PS: I originally intended to make this a double-topic since I had another subject (about crystals) closely related to this; but I figure I'd continue it later (or just start another thread?) given that my body is almost depleted of physical energy right now and it behooves me to lay it to rest.

    Print this item

      semi confused terminology in the Law of One
    Posted by: Plenum - 05-25-2012, 09:22 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (4)

    I know that there was some talk about a Law of One wiki a little while back ... but no-one seems to have followed through on that (I believe that zen and tobey were looking for more contributors, etc).

    in the meantime, maybe this thread could serve as a talking point for what we might consider "confused" or "difficult" terminology.

    I'll throw out a few terms that have challenged me over the years, and ones that I have probably only recently got a handle on. Feel free to add your interpretations.

    - -

    inner planes = the time/space component of something

    spirit complex = shuttle (Ra equates these two terms at some point)

    densities = not equal to dimensions

    distortions = not equal to something bad (for example, healing is a 'distortion")

    inner light = Polaris (thing sitting on top of your head)

    catalyst = anything that comes to your awareness (for eg, there are a million things/memories that one can think about, and yet there are only a few that register at any one time. Why do those things stick?)

    emotions = best catalyst

    Print this item

      Invisible Ribbands
    Posted by: native - 05-24-2012, 09:29 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (11)

    What's up with Ra's rubber band metaphor (I assume that's what they're talking about)? Is it related to some sort of personal anecdote of the group?

    "We encourage the conscious strengthening of those invisible ribbands which fly from the wrists of those who go forward to seek what you may call the Grail. All is well, my friends. We leave you in hopes that each may find true colors to fly in that great metaphysical quest and urge each to urge each other in love, praise, and thanksgiving."

    Print this item

      The suspended state.
    Posted by: Patrick - 05-24-2012, 03:58 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (33)

    I am currently contemplating what Ra called the suspended state. What most of us call being unconscious. Is it what happens when we sleep ?

    Are we truly unconscious? Or does the self retracts behind the veil and is still conscious without us having access to these memories when the self comes back on this side of the veil?

    Quote:59.20 Questioner: Why would this reverse aging?

    Ra: I am Ra. Aging is a function of the effects of various electro-magnetic fields upon the electromagnetic fields of the mind/body/spirit complex. In this position there is no input or disturbance of the fields, nor is any activity within the electro-magnetic field complex of the mind/body/spirit complex allowed full sway. The vacuum sucks any such disturbance away. Thus the entity feels nothing and is suspended.

    35.8 Questioner: Well in that case I would like to know the motivation for this use of Abraham Lincoln’s body at that time?

    Ra: I am Ra. This shall be the last full query of this session as we find the instrument quite low in vital energies.

    The one known as Abraham had an extreme difficulty in many ways and, due to physical, mental, and spiritual pain, was weary of life but without the orientation to self-destruction. In your time, 1853, this entity was contacted in sleep by a fourth-density being. This being was concerned with the battle between the forces of light and the forces of darkness which have been waged in fourth density for many of your years.

    This entity accepted the honor/duty of completing the one known as Abraham’s karmic patterns and the one known as Abraham discovered that this entity would attempt those things which the one known as Abraham desired to do but felt it could not. Thus the exchange was made.

    The entity, Abraham, was taken to a plane of suspension until the cessation of its physical vehicle much as though we of Ra would arrange with this instrument to remain in the vehicle, come out of the trance state, and function as this instrument, leaving this instrument’s mind and spirit complex in its suspended state.

    The planetary energies at this time were at what seemed to this entity to be at a critical point, for that which you know as freedom had gained in acceptance as a possibility among many peoples. This entity saw the work done by those beginning the democratic concept of freedom, as you call it, in danger of being abridged or abrogated by the rising belief and use of the principle of the enslavement of entities. This is a negative concept of a fairly serious nature in your density. This entity, therefore, went forward into what it saw as the battle for the light, for healing of a rupture in the concept of freedom.

    This entity did not gain or lose karma by these activities due to its detachment from any outcome. Its attitude throughout was one of service to others, more especially to the downtrodden or enslaved. The polarity of the individual was somewhat, but not severely, lessened by the cumulative feelings and thought-forms which were created due to large numbers of entities leaving the physical plane due to trauma of battle.

    May we ask if this is the information you requested or if we may supply any further information?

    83.3 Questioner: Thank you. I’m going to ask a rather long, complex question here, and I would request that the answer to each portion of this question be given if there was a significant difference prior to the veil than following the veil so that I can get an idea of how what we experience now is used for better polarization.

    Asking if there is any significant difference, and what was the difference, before the veil in the following while incarnate in third density: sleep, dreams, physical pain, mental pain, sex, disease, catalyst programming, random catalyst, relationships, or communication with the higher self or with the mind/body/spirit totality or any other mind, body, or spirit functions before the veil that would be significant with respect to their difference after the veil?

    Ra: I am Ra. Firstly, let us establish that both before and after the veil the same conditions existed in time/space; that is, the veiling process is a space/time phenomenon.

    Secondly, the character of experience was altered drastically by the veiling process. In some cases such as the dreaming and the contact with the higher self, the experience was quantitatively different due to the fact that the veiling is a primary cause of the value of dreams and is also the single door against which the higher self must stand awaiting entry. Before veiling, dreams were not for the purpose of using the so-called unconscious to further utilize catalyst but were used to learn/teach from teach/learners within the inner planes as well as those of outer origin of higher density. As you deal with each subject of which you spoke you may observe, during the veiling process, not a quantitative change in the experience but a qualitative one.

    Let us, as an example, choose your sexual activities of energy transfer. If you have a desire to treat other subjects in detail please query forthwith. In the instance of the sexual activity of those not dwelling within the veiling each activity was a transfer. There were some transfers of strength. Most were rather attenuated in the strength of the transfer due to the lack of veiling.

    In the third density entities are attempting to learn the ways of love. If it can be seen that all are one being it becomes much more difficult for the undisciplined personality to choose one mate and, thereby, initiate itself into a program of service. It is much more likely that the sexual energy will be dissipated more randomly without either great joy or great sorrow depending from these experiences.

    Therefore, the green-ray energy transfer, being almost without exception the case in sexual energy transfer prior to veiling, remains weakened and without significant crystallization. The sexual energy transfers and blockages after veiling have been discussed previously. It may be seen to be a more complex study but one far more efficient in crystallizing those who seek the green-ray energy center.

    86.7 Questioner: You stated that dreaming, if made available to the conscious mind, will aid greatly in polarization. Would you define dreaming or tell us what it is and how it aids in polarization?

    Ra: I am Ra. Dreaming is an activity of communication through the veil of the unconscious mind and the conscious mind. The nature of this activity is wholly dependent upon the situation regarding the energy center blockages, activations, and crystallizations of a given mind/body/spirit complex.

    In one who is blocked at two of the three lower energy centers dreaming will be of value in the polarization process in that there will be a repetition of those portions of recent catalyst as well as deeper-held blockages, thereby giving the waking mind clues as to the nature of these blockages and hints as to possible changes in perception which may lead to the unblocking.

    This type of dreaming or communication through the veiled portions of the mind occurs also with those mind/body/spirit complexes which are functioning with far less blockage and enjoying the green-ray activation or higher activation at those times at which the mind/body/spirit complex experiences catalyst, momentarily reblocking or baffling or otherwise distorting the flow of energy influx. Therefore, in all cases it is useful to a mind/body/spirit complex to ponder the content and emotive resonance of dreams.

    For those whose green-ray energy centers have been activated as well as for those whose green-ray energy centers are offered an unusual unblockage due to extreme catalyst, such as what is termed the physical death of the self or one which is beloved occurring in what you may call your near future, dreaming takes on another activity. This is what may loosely be termed precognition or a knowing which is prior to that which shall occur in physical manifestation in your yellow-ray third-density space/time. This property of the mind depends upon its placement, to a great extent, in time/space so that the terms of present and future and past have no meaning. This will, if made proper use of by the mind/body/spirit, enable this entity to enter more fully into the all-compassionate love of each and every circumstance including those circumstances against which an entity may have a strong distortion towards what you may call unhappiness.

    As a mind/body/spirit consciously chooses the path of the adept and, with each energy center balanced to a minimal degree, begins to open the indigo-ray energy center, the so-called dreaming becomes the most efficient tool for polarization, for, if it is known by the adept that work may be done in consciousness while the so-called conscious mind rests, this adept may call upon those which guide it, those presences which surround it, and, most of all, the magical personality which is the higher self in space/time analog as it moves into the sleeping mode of consciousness. With these affirmations attended to, the activity of dreaming reaches that potential of learn/teaching which is most helpful to increasing the distortions of the adept towards its chosen polarity.

    There are other possibilities of the dreaming not so closely aligned with the increase in polarity which we do not cover at this particular space/time.

    Print this item

      which was the third influence?
    Posted by: Plenum - 05-22-2012, 11:03 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (16)

    in this passage here, Don asks about where entities have come from that populated the earth.

    there are 3 MAJOR INFLUENCES, and 13 Minor Ones.

    Quote:91.14 Questioner: How many different planets have supplied the individuals which now inhabit this planet?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is perceived by us to be unimportant information, but harmless. There are three major planetary influences upon your planetary sphere, besides those of your own second-density derivation, and thirteen minor planetary groups in addition to the above.

    going back into the material, I can deduce that TWO of these groups are Maldek and Mars (both planets within our solar system, and both who destroyed their own 3rd density conditions).

    I am baffled as to the identity of the THIRD?

    Print this item

      "see the creator"
    Posted by: Plenum - 05-20-2012, 02:36 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (32)

    this is an interesting set of exercises, in which one "sees" the creator.

    step 1: seek the love

    Quote:10.14 Questioner: For the general development of the reader of this book, could you state some of the practices or exercises to perform to produce an acceleration toward the Law of One?

    Ra: I am Ra.

    Exercise One. This is the most nearly centered and useable within your illusion complex. The moment contains love. That is the lesson/goal of this illusion or density. The exercise is to consciously seek that love in awareness and understanding distortions. The first attempt is the cornerstone. Upon this choosing rests the remainder of the life-experience of an entity. The second seeking of love within the moment begins the addition. The third seeking powers the second, the fourth powering or doubling the third. As with the previous type of empowerment, there will be some loss of power due to flaws within the seeking in the distortion of insincerity. However, the conscious statement of self to self of the desire to seek love is so central an act of will that, as before, the loss of power due to this friction is inconsequential.

    then the Creator is seen everywhere!!

    Quote:Exercise Two. The universe is one being. When a mind/body/spirit complex views another mind/body/spirit complex, see the Creator. This is an helpful exercise.

    Exercise Three. Gaze within a mirror. See the Creator.

    Exercise Four. Gaze at the creation which lies about the mind/body/spirit complex of each entity. See the Creator.

    and this is very useful caveat:

    Quote:The foundation or prerequisite of these exercises is a predilection towards what may be called meditation, contemplation, or prayer. With this attitude, these exercises can be processed. Without it, the data will not sink down into the roots of the tree of mind, thus enabling and ennobling the body and touching the spirit.

    Print this item

      how much spiritual MASS do you have?
    Posted by: Plenum - 05-11-2012, 08:39 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (10)

    this question relates to:

    Quote:37.8 Questioner: Thank you. And thank you for that explanation of the mathematics too. Could you define spiritual mass?
    Ra: I am Ra. This will be the last full question of this session.

    Spiritual mass is that which begins to attract the out-moving and on-going vibratory oscillations of being-ness into the gravity, speaking in a spiritual sense, well of the great central sun, core, or Creator of the infinite universes.

    I think I'm getting pretty heavy these days. I think I must have 500 lbs of spiritual mass (that's about 226kg for metric forum users). Might need to lose some of that Tongue

    Print this item

    Pages (165): « Previous 1 … 118 119 120 121 122 … 165 Next »
     

    Forum Statistics
    » Members: 12,007
    » Latest member: Phantomy
    » Forum threads: 15,903
    » Forum posts: 300,175

    Full Statistics

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media