Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Portal

    Latest Threads
    A Comprehensive Analysis ...
    Forum: Science & Technology
    Last Post: the
    08-06-2022, 09:25 AM
    » Replies: 495
    » Views: 454,776
    The mysterious nature of ...
    Forum: Olio
    Last Post: Confused
    08-06-2022, 07:14 AM
    » Replies: 16,731
    » Views: 8,381,260
    How genuine is your inten...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 03:53 AM
    » Replies: 28
    » Views: 66,439
    Choosing polarities, surv...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 12:07 AM
    » Replies: 25
    » Views: 33,948
    what music are you listen...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: schubert
    08-05-2022, 11:51 PM
    » Replies: 3,650
    » Views: 2,675,923
    What youtube video are yo...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 08:24 PM
    » Replies: 502
    » Views: 327,176
    Are you going to take the...
    Forum: Health & Diet
    Last Post: zedro
    08-05-2022, 07:17 PM
    » Replies: 2,075
    » Views: 1,480,355
    Daily Q'uote
    Forum: L/L Research Channeling Archives
    Last Post: omcasey
    08-05-2022, 03:43 PM
    » Replies: 2,593
    » Views: 1,917,486
    what movie did you last w...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 09:11 AM
    » Replies: 386
    » Views: 512,982
    All-Time Favourite Hits o...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 04:20 AM
    » Replies: 39
    » Views: 42,538

    Search Forums

    (Advanced Search)

      VI. THE HIGHER SELF IS ALSO CALLED THE MAGICAL PERSONALITY
    Posted by: Plenum - 07-02-2012, 09:56 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (16)

    found this here: http://www.spiritofra.com/Ra-section%201.htm

    Quote:RA: When the magical personality is properly invoked the self has invoked its Higher Self. Thus a bridge between space/time and time/space is made and the 6th density magical personality experiences directly the 3rd density catalyst for the duration of the working. It is most central to deliberately take off the magical personality after the working in order that the Higher Self may resume its appropriate function as your Higher Self operating in many realms, not just in the 3rd density. (B3, 192)
    QUESTION: The 3 aspects of the magical personality are stated to be power, love and wisdom. Are these its only primary aspects? (B3, 192)
    RA: The magical personality is a being of unity, a being of 6th density, and the equivalent of what you call your Higher Self and at the same time is a personality enormously rich in variety of experience and subtlety of emotion. (B3, 192)

    and more quotes here: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=m...0&ss=1&o=s

    this one here about Invocations and Evocations is still confusing to me.

    Quote:73.7 The second station is the evocation of the great cross of life. This is an extension of the magical personality to become the Creator. Again, all invocations and evocations are drawn through the violet energy center. This may then be continued towards whatever energy centers are desired to be used.

    Print this item

      difference between the will and the personality
    Posted by: Plenum - 06-29-2012, 04:28 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (7)

    I was wondering if anyone could help explain this short passage here:


    Quote:52.7 nstead, we appreciate and recommend the use of your second verb in regard to the use of the will. Acceptance of self, forgiveness of self, and the direction of the will; this is the path towards the disciplined personality. Your faculty of will is that which is powerful within you as co-Creator. You cannot ascribe to this faculty too much importance. Thus it must be carefully used and directed in service to others for those upon the positively oriented path.

    There is great danger in the use of the will as the personality becomes stronger, for it may be used even subconsciously in ways reducing the polarity of the entity

    the Will I can understand as a way of directing 'mental force', but I would have thought that the Personality becomes more balanced as one progresses, and actually diminishes as a factor.


    Print this item

      a subtle redefine of Enslavement
    Posted by: Plenum - 06-27-2012, 10:15 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (8)

    most people think slavery is chains and whips. But the most effective enslavement is through that of the mind, and convincing others they are lesser co-creators than you. Here is an interesting passage:

    Quote:The relationship of such an entity to fourth-density negative entities is one of the more powerful and the less powerful. The negative path posits slavery of the less powerful as a means of learning the desire to serve the self to the extent that the will is brought to bear. It is in this way that polarity is increased in the negative sense. Thus fourth-density entities are willing slaves of such a fifth-density entity, there being no doubt whatsoever of the relative power of each.

    87.8 Questioner: A reflection of this could be seen in our density in many of those leaders who instigate war and have followers who support, in total conviction that the direction of conquest is correct. Is this correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. Any organization which demands obedience without question upon the basis of relative power is functioning according to the above-described plan.

    the last bit in bold is the telling point. One thinks first of the military, with it's severely defined hierarchy (you get court-marshalled if you disobey a direct order from a superior officer). But one can also think of modern companies/corporations, where your 'obedience' in the workplace is a given.

    Print this item

      breakdown of the years of the LOO
    Posted by: Plenum - 06-27-2012, 10:01 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (3)

    one interesting thing I noticed recently is that almost ALL of the Ra Material was transmitted in 1981-1982, and almost three quarters of it was in the first year.

    1981: sessions 1 to 75
    1982: sessions 76 to 101
    1983/1984: sessions 102 through 106

    for some reason I had got it into my head that the Chanellings were a weekly event, when Don got time off work. Obviously this understanding was very flawed Smile

    looking at the dates, in 1981, there were often sequences of 5 chanellings in 5 days, which would have exerted a fearsome toll on one's vital energies. One is amazed they made it into the second year lol.

    anyway, just an interesting tidbit I'd thought I'd share.

    peace yo

    Print this item

      What is an Other-Self? Are 2D Entities Other-Selves?
    Posted by: Monica - 06-22-2012, 05:13 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (24)

    There are many references to the term other-self in the Law of One.

    Here is the very first reference to other-self:

    Quote:33.15 Questioner: Can you list any sub-headings under the self that would— or ways that the self is acted on catalytically to produce experience?
    Ra: I am Ra. Firstly, the self unmanifested. Secondly, the self in relation to the societal self created by self and other-self. Thirdly, the interaction between self and the gadgets, toys, and amusements of the self, other-self invention. Fourthly, the self relationship with those attributes which you may call war and rumors of war.

    We have developed a philosophy based on an assumption about what an other-self is. The STO path is Service to Others...meaning other-selves.

    We are instructed by Ra to accept and forgive other-selves...see them as us, as One...realize that they too serve the Creator...realize that they provide catalyst to us.

    We also know from Ra that the key to polarizing STO is to love, accept, forgive and serve other-selves, while the key to polarizing STS is loving/serving self only. A great deal of our understanding about the Law of One is based on the premise that serving other-selves = serving other people; ie. human 3D entities.

    However, did Ra ever explicitly define the term other-self?

    Maybe they did and I missed it. If so, if someone could direct me to the quote in which Ra defines other-self, I would be most appreciative!

    For now, it seems to me that there is an assumption being made, that to polarize STO we must love/accept/forgive/serve, and have compassion for, other humans.

    My question is: Upon what basis are we concluding that? How can we be so sure that other-self refers to other human selves only?

    Or, as some might think, 3D and up? Does other-self refer only to those entities who have evolved to 3D or beyond? Are ET's other-selves because they're 3D or higher?

    This next quote is very enlightening:

    Quote:19.15 Questioner: Then the newest third-density beings who have just made the transition from second are still strongly biased towards self-service. There must be many other mechanisms to create an awareness of the possibility of service to others.

    I am wondering, first about the mechanism and I am wondering when the split takes place where the entity is able to continue on the road to service to self that will eventually take him on to fourth density.

    I’m assuming that an entity can start, say, in second density with service to self and continue right on through and just stay on what we would call the path of service to self and never be pulled over. Is this correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The second-density concept of serving self includes the serving of those associated with tribe or pack. This is not seen in second density as separation of self and other-self. All is seen as self since in some forms of second-density entities, if the tribe or pack becomes weakened, so does the entity within the tribe or pack.

    The new or initial third-density entity has this innocent, shall we say, bias or distortion towards viewing those in the family, the society, as you would call, perhaps, country, as self. Thus though a distortion not helpful for progress in third density, it is without polarity.

    The break becomes apparent when the entity perceives other-selves as other-selves and consciously determines to manipulate other-selves for the benefit of the self. This is the beginning of the road of which you speak.

    The last paragraph is about the STS path so I'm not going to address that, as it is off-topic for the present discussion. I'm interested only in the definition of other-selves.

    Apparently, 2D entities consider their pack to be one with self, whereas new 3D entities do see their family/team/tribe/country as other-selves but has a bias towards them. We see this is quite prevalent in our society, wherein people become quite identified with their sports team, their religion, their political party, their country, etc. "I'm a Texan!...God Bless America!" (forget about the other countries)..."Only Christians go to heaven! I got my ticket!"...etc. and of course the more ugly expressions of such identification: racism, homophobia, bigotry, and the most hideous of all: war, in which it's ok to go kill someone else or their kids because they are "not us."

    So we see that the concept of other-self as in "not me" is quite alive and well in our society. But as Law of One students, are we not tasked with evolving beyond such separation? Are we not tasked with exemplifying the concepts of Oneness and service to other-selves, rather than continuing to support the separation between self and other-selves?

    Let's now take it a step further.

    Where do 2D entities fit in?

    We're not likely to hold a grudge against our dog for pooping on the carpet, in the same way we might harbor resentment towards our abusive father. So clearly, our little furry 2D brethren don't facilitate the same type of catalyst that 3D humans do.

    But, in terms of service to others, and activating green ray by developing compassion for other-selves, how is it any different dealing with an animal, compared to dealing with a human?

    Is compassion is compassion is compassion? Or, are there degrees of compassion? Is compassion bestowed upon a human somehow more evolved, more noble, more benevolent than compassion bestowed upon an animal?

    Here's one of my absolute favorite stories of compassion. It's a story told in pictures...poignant pictures that get tears from me every time, no matter how many times I see them.

    Pay special attention to the expression on the woman's face, in the pic of her right after she got her dog back, and the pic after that where she is hugging the hero.

    http://lumberjocks.com/topics/34250

    What a beautiful story!

    Yet, I cannot help but wonder what went on in that man's mind when he jumped off that bridge. Was he thinking "I'm going to save the dog because I care about the woman" or was he thinking "I'm going to save the dog because I care about the dog." ??

    Or was he thinking anything at all?

    Did he simply take action because the situation presented itself? Did he analyze whether the woman's feelings were more important or the dog's life? Would he have saved the dog, had the woman not been present, and it was 'just' some feral dog whom no one would ever miss?

    We'll never know. He might not even know himself.

    The point is, that some questions are raised. If new 3D entities are just barely beginning to see themselves as individuals, after having been one with the pack, and then their next task after that (in order to graduate from 3D) is to develop compassion for other-selves, it makes sense that the first step in that process is to develop compassion for those other-selves closest to them: their families, their team, their church members, their country, because they are viewed as extensions of self. Is this really compassion for other-selves? Or is it just self-serving, because other-self is actually just an extension of self?

    It seems to me that an act of compassion for an other-self who is quite different, might be quite different in terms of chakra activation and polarizing potential, than an act of compassion towards an other-self who is strongly identified with self.

    In other words, a racist homophobe evangelical who finally feels compassion for a black, gay, Pagan man, will have a much stronger polarizing result than if he felt compassion for a white, straight, Christian man. Just getting over that mountain of bigotry, to the place where compassion dwells, took much more effort than easily sliding into compassion for a fellow church-goer with whom he has dinner after church.

    What prompted him to finally feel compassion for that black gay Pagan man? Was it because his daughter had just announced she is a lesbian Pagan? Or maybe a black gay man just impressed him by rescuing his dog from icy waters? Something probably happened, to facilitate that sudden awareness that the person he formerly thought of as 'beneath him' is now an other-self.

    All are part of the process.

    Society has made great progress towards developing compassion towards those who are of a different race, sexual persuasion, etc. though there is still a long ways to go. At what point does this compassion extend towards those of other (lower) densities?

    We've made progress in areas of sexism, racism, and various other isms...how about speciesism?

    At what point, if ever, are 2D entities considered other-selves?

    When a feral dog becomes family? Is that when it is no longer an 'it' - just a stray dog out on the street with zero worth - and then becomes a 'he' or 'she' with a name, a personality, and a vet bill of hundreds or even thousands of dollars, because s/he is now a loved and cherished member of the family?

    Why is this dog any different from the feral dog running down the street?

    Isn't this just extending that yellow-ray identification of self? Is it really love of others to care for that dog? Or is it love of self?

    Further, why is that family dog any different from the cow or chicken that was eaten for dinner? Pigs make great pets. How is the next-door neighbor's potbelly pig, who plays fetch along with the dog, any different from the pig that was served for dinner? How is the pet parrot any different from the chicken that was served for lunch?

    It is NOT my intention to get into another meat-vs-veg debate! Anyone wishing to do so may visit the threads already in place for that purpose.

    So please, avoid any such debate in this thread. The purpose of this thread is to explore:

    1. What is the definition of other-self?
    2. Why is it assumed that other-self pertains only to humans?
    3. When, if ever, are 2D animals considered other-selves?

    ...from a Law of One perspective of course. I think these are important questions, being that the concept of other-self is so integral to understanding the STO path and the Law of One in general.

    The only clue from Ra I could find, as to the actual definition of other-self, was this:

    Quote:68.18 Questioner: Then I am assuming if the negative polarity used any other approach that did not use the free will of the other-self, he would lose polarization and magical power. This is correct, isn’t it?
    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

    Though not explicitly stated, the fact that Ra said "This is correct" without any corrections when Don mentioned the free will of the other-self, might be a clue that an other-self is defined as an entity who has free-will.

    This doesn't, of course, preclude other possible attributes, but it does seem to imply that free will is an attribute.



    Print this item

      The Bible: Hell is same as 4th density STS?
    Posted by: darklight - 06-19-2012, 07:06 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (59)

    Is this maybe true what the Bible says about the hell? We cant find anything in the Bible about STS, but the hell seems another word for 4th density STS.

    Print this item

      The mental learn/teachings necessary for contact with intelligent infinity.
    Posted by: LsavedSmeD - 06-16-2012, 01:49 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (20)

    This is a very confusing portion of the LOO that I cannot come to grips with understanding with a general completeness.


    Quote:5.2 Questioner: We have decided to accept, if offered, the honor/duty of learning/teaching the healing process. I would ask as to the first step which we should accomplish in becoming effective healers.

    Ra: I am Ra. We shall begin with the first of the three teachings/learnings.

    We begin with the mental learn/teachings necessary for contact with intelligent infinity. The prerequisite of mental work is the ability to retain silence of self at a steady state when required by the self. The mind must be opened like a door. The key is silence.

    Within the door lies an hierarchical construction you may liken unto geography and in some ways geometry, for the hierarchy is quite regular, bearing inner relationships.

    To begin to master the concept of mental discipline it is necessary to examine the self. The polarity of your dimension must be internalized. Where you find patience within your mind you must consciously find the corresponding impatience and vice versa. Each thought that a being has, has in its turn an antithesis. The disciplines of the mind involve, first of all, identifying both those things of which you approve and those things of which you disapprove within yourself, and then balancing each and every positive and negative charge with its equal. The mind contains all things. Therefore, you must discover this completeness within yourself.

    The second mental discipline is acceptance of the completeness within your consciousness. It is not for a being of polarity in the physical consciousness to pick and choose among attributes, thus building the roles that cause blockages and confusions in the already-distorted mind complex. Each acceptance smoothes part of the many distortions that the faculty you call judgment engenders.

    The third discipline of the mind is a repetition of the first but with the gaze outward towards the fellow entities that it meets. In each entity there exists completeness. Thus, the ability to understand each balance is necessary. When you view patience, you are responsible for mirroring in your mental understanding, patience/impatience. When you view impatience, it is necessary for your mental configuration of understanding to be impatience/patience. We use this as a simple example. Most configurations of mind have many facets, and understanding of either self polarities, or what you would call other-self polarities, can and must be understood as subtle work.

    The next step is the acceptance of the other-self polarities, which mirrors the second step.

    These are the first four steps of learning mental discipline. The fifth step involves observing the geographical and geometrical relationships and ratios of the mind, the other mind, the mass mind, and the infinite mind.

    The second area of learn/teaching is the study/understanding of the body complexes. It is necessary to know your body well. This is a matter of using the mind to examine how the feelings, the biases, what you would call the emotions, affect various portions of the body complex. It shall be necessary to both understand the bodily polarities and to accept them, repeating in a chemical/physical manifestation the work you have done upon the mind bethinking the consciousness.

    The body is a creature of the mind’s creation. It has its biases. The biological bias must be first completely understood and then the opposite bias allowed to find full expression in understanding. Again, the process of acceptance of the body as a balanced, as well as polarized, individual may then be accomplished.

    It is then the task to extend this understanding to the bodies of the other-selves whom you will meet. The simplest example of this is the understanding that each biological male is female; each biological female is male. This is a simple example. However, in almost every case wherein you are attempting the understanding of the body of self or other-self, you will again find that the most subtle discernment is necessary in order to fully grasp the polarity complexes involved.

    At this time we would suggest closing the description until the next time of work so that we may devote time to the third area commensurate with its importance.

    We can answer a query if it is a short one before we leave this instrument.

    Some of this I understand very well but the first large paragraph and, mor e significantly, the paragraph in bold is extremely confusing and I am having trouble coming to terms with it.

    If I mirror someones impatience in my mind does this mean I should feel impatience too?

    I would be extremely grateful with my brothers and sisters who are reading this to help me out by sharing their understanding or explanations of this quoted portion of the LOO.

    Print this item

      The Cycles of Infinity
    Posted by: Siren - 06-11-2012, 02:47 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (23)

    There is Infinity. This is All There Is. This is the One Infinite Creator.

    Infinity is intelligent. Intelligent Infinity then, realizing its infinite potential and, through the catalyst of (free-)will, concentrates itself into a focus, or thought, which is vibrant. This focus* yields a kinetic. This kinetic, motion, or intelligent energy, is the creative principle which generates further work, action and motion, which manifests as light; and through these vibratory rhythms, articulations and distortions, the basic structure of the universe is designed; its geometrical patterns, ratios and laws mathematically configured.

    The Creation

    Light is the very fabric of Creation, arranged, organized and articulated by the Creator in a variety of mathematical configurations and geometrical patterns, figures and ratios (this resulting in various degrees of "solidity" or "consistency," vibrationally-speaking, going all the way from denser/slower to subtler/faster "densities" or "frequencies" of light).

    Thus, the white light is prismatically refracted, or fragmentized, into seven primary illusions, or vibratory light spectra (or grades, levels, stages, or dimensionalities): each spectra categorically and experientially different from the other; each one representing a distinct set of experiences and lessons to be learned/experienced by the Creator in order to satisfy its own intelligent estimate of knowing/experiencing itself and (re)discovering/exploring its own infinitude through an evolutionary process.

    Evolution

    The Creation unfolds ifinitely outwards. Once condensed, it begins to draw/spiral inwards (or fold back into its center: the Creator). The process or experience of evolution is then set in motion, as planetary spheres begin to form out of primal matter (red-ray spectrum), and single foci of consciousness begin to originate, grow and individuate (orange-ray spectrum forward). These entities, or foci of consciousness, having their beginnings in un-awareness, progress through the evolutionary spiral stairway, if you will, processing, distilling and refining experiences/lessons, gradually (re)discovering and becoming more self-conscious/aware of their beingness as the Creator as they transition through each vibratory spectra in sequential manner; each "step" building upon the former (each ray or frequency of light corresponding to a distinct grade or vibratory-rate of awareness/consciousness).

    Thus entities evolve, seeking their source, first un-consciously by instinct, then by will and conscious desire; being drawn/called further upwards/inwards in each subsequent act, moving ever "closer" to the original thought of the Creator, to finally merge with it-self once again in oneness.

    In this manner the Creator recapitulates in reverse its own "awakening" or "coming-into-being" in temporal and spatial configurations by exploring limitations, distortions, biases, necessities, differentiations, etc. Thus the One becomes "many"—or rather, invests itself in the exploration of "many-ness"—in order to know/experience its infinite oneness. This is the single purpose of Creation: experience.

    Infinity - Ad Infinitum

    Once the Creation is concluded and the Creator is fulfilled with the experience of itself, the Creator melds back into the very mystery of its own infinitude (the kinetic phase of Intelligent Infinity returning into a state of un-potentiation): that void, or plenum, full of infinite potential, from which a new Creation, a new intelligence, a new infinity, may begin anew.


    *This focus, or concentration of Intelligent Infinity into thought, is the active, creative principle behind all of Creation; it may be called the Prime Mover, the Creator, the Logos, which may perhaps be more accurately undersood as Love. This Love is an energy of an extremely high order, the prime force behind Creation, responsible for the intelligent organization, arrangement and articulation of all light into illusory matrices of experience.

    Print this item

      The Ways of Acceptance (alternative reading of 'STO')
    Posted by: Plenum - 06-08-2012, 09:23 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (20)

    I think the term 'Service to Others' has a great potential for being mis-understood. This is because our cultural heritage has legacied to us various christian notions of service and self-sacrifice. Most prominent among these are:

    * doing charitable deeds (visible service)
    * donating money/time (pouring one's personal resources into an organisation)
    * martyrdom ('sacrifice' of the self, for the perceived benefit of the other).

    Ra uses the term STO primarily, but Don also asked about other definitions or understandings of polarity.

    - -

    my own understanding/practice of the 'positive path' has come down to this:

    The Ways of Acceptance. The Ra material offers much advice on self-balancing, and these are keyed around the notion of 'acceptance'. Now, some might say this is putting too much emphasis on the technique, but Ra offers us Archetype 22 as the 'choice'; which is a unifying concept. What more unifying concept is there than making a choice of accepting something, or rejecting it?

    this further expands on the notion of the spiritual path as one of BEING, rather than DOING. The Doing, of course, arises when an opportunity presents itself, and when there is a calling; but the emphasis is on the cultivation of an attitude which is kindly and accepting, and embracing.

    Print this item

      The Law of Light
    Posted by: Siren - 06-07-2012, 03:14 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (21)

    [Latest update/revision: Feb 05 2013]

    Everything you see or otherwise imagine is made of light. And there is no difference between seeing or imagining. You might say seeing is done by the optical lenses of the physical body/apparatus which is filtered into the mind complex for internal processing, and that perhaps the functioning of imagining should be strictly relegated to the mind complex alone—it matters not. This is the point: there is an observer. It is not a question of whether what you observe is “solid” or “intangible”—the point is that you are observing. The act of observing implies an object of observation; which must, out of necessity, be visual—as are all phenomena occurring both/either outside in space/time or/and inside in time/space—and all visual phenomena are constructs of light.

    Light comes into being by the action of observation. And the ultimate observer is that one great Original Thought: that focus of intelligent energy known as the Logos, or Love (aptly called "the Creative Principle"). It is by this kinetic focus of pure motion/vibration that all is illuminated. They key is focus, or thought. Thus, the 2nd distortion—Love—creates the 3rd: light.

    And you, by being a focus of consciousness, are already a co-Creator.

    And though you may not realize it (or may, to greater or lesser extent), you are creating, organizing, ordering, regulating and modulating all the light material around you (within the possibilities/limitations of 3rd-density and, to some extent, 4th) into vibrationally matching arrangements, patterns, and configurations of light by the sheer act of thought alone.

    Thought is the Creative Principle. Thought is a focus of consciousness as intelligent energy. Thought is Love. Love is creative (and when I say creativity I mean con-structive and de-structive; or in other words, trans-formative, for Love is not static; Love is kinetic, flux, pure vibration).

    What you may not yet realize, though, is that “matter” is light—not clear white light in its un-diffracted purity, but a certain “quality” or “intensity” of the original light—a “type” of light nonetheless.

    Indeed, light is the only material in and of Creation.

    And Thought creates light. Or if you prefer, Love creates light. Thought, or love, is the Creative Principle: the Great Observer; the active, kinetic focus of intelligent energy, which not only creates or manifests light, but also has the power (i.e. free-will) to direct it, arrange it, and organize it into holographic, illusory shapes, forms and patterns. This is how all densities and planes of manifestation come into being. This is what the Logos is and what the Logos does.

    And you are dancing Thoughts—sub-Logoi, co-Creators.


    There Is No Other Material Except Light

    The “stuff” of the universe is light. The “stuff” that makes up your bodies, whether now in 3rd-density or in 4th, 5th, or 6th, is light. The “stuff” that makes up absolutely every-thing is nothing else but light—although different grades, intensities, or qualities of light; from grosser to finer (or from “material” to “ethereal,” if you like). Light makes up every-thing across all densities—albeit the materiality, substance, physicality, form, texture, solidity, tangibility, flexibility, and overall plasticity (and transparency) of this light is determined by the angular velocity (i.e. vibratory rate, or rotational speed) of the core photonic particle/waves that make up the “stuff”—the material (which in turn makes up the bodies)—of each density. In other words, the yellow-ray frequency of light is different than green- or blue-ray light. Thus, the physicality/materiality of each true-color body changes from density to density (i.e. bodies become more subtle, more refined, more ethereal as the entity moves upwards/inwards ever closer to that great Original Thought which is the source of the un-distorted/un-diffracted, pure, clear white Light).

    To be clear: there is One Light. This pure, clear white Light is the manifestation of Love, the Logos, the Creative Principle, the Original Though: the kinetic, energetic focus of Intelligent Infinity in Its free-will.

    Those who seek the Light seek the manifestation of Love. Those who seek the Thought seek the Heart of Creation—the source of all Light. Needless to say, Love dwells in light and light is made of Love.

    Everything I am here to say is summarized in this one quote alone. I believe comprehending the following is absolutely fundamental to understanding the nature of manifestation and the structure of dimensionalities:

    Quote:64.6 Our understanding is that there is no other material except light.


    Now, let us “unpack” this. What is a material exactly?

    Material (n.)
    late 14c., "substance from which something is made" directly from Late Latin materialis (adj.) "of or belonging to matter," from Latin materia (n.) "matter, stuff, substance from which something is made, built, constructed or formed."

    In other words, a material is a substance used to build, construct, create some-thing. And to the best of my knowledge, the only material there is in and of Creation is light. Ra has served to confirm this for me (and this is one of the reasons why I hold The Ra Material in such high esteem).

    As you read along remember the definition of material, and keep this in mind: light = original material.

    Let's recap:

    Quote:15.21 The first distortion, free will, finds focus. This is the second distortion known to you as Logos, the Creative Principle or Love. This intelligent energy thus creates a distortion known as Light.

    1st distortion = free-will
    2nd distortion = Logos = Love = Creative Principle = intelligent energy
    3rd distortion = light

    In other words, light does not make love—light is the manifestation of love (and by “manifestation” I mean every- and any-thing you see or otherwise imagine; every-thing that is subject to the visual observation of an observer, whether physically or metaphysically). Love—as the focus or thought of intelligent infinity—is, in and of itself, unmanifest: it is beyond manifestation—Love is the manifestator rather than the manifestation, so to speak. Love becomes manifest only in, through, and by light. Love creates light. Light does not create love. There is a precursor to light, and that is love. Further, light—independently of all else—does not equal love except as in “light/love;” for as love creates light, so too will light be full of love, full of energy, full of this creative life. However, it is Love that creates light, not the other way around; and it is love that uses this light as the material for Creation. Thus, love become love/light, and light invariably becomes light/love—there is no light without love just as there is no painting without a painter and no dream without a dreamer—the "heart" or "soul" of the artist will always be in its architecture, shall we say. The moment Intelligent Infinity, in Its free-will, found focus (it con-centrated into a Thought, or Love, or Logos), the moment light came into being and all was illuminated.

    Understand: (1) the free-will of Intelligent Infinity leads to (2) a kinetic focus (i.e. thought) of intelligent energy, which manifests (3) the light material (out of which every-thing is subsequently made by diffractions of this one white light, thus resulting in various experiential illusory patterns).

    We’ll get into all this more in detail as we go along.

    Quote:41.9 The simplest manifest being is light or what you have called the photon.

    Plain and clear: the simplest manifest being is light (a.k.a. the photon, in modern scientific parlance). Understand: this is the building block of all other forms of manifestation—including "matter." Anyone with an ultra-magnifying microscope can look into a piece of human flesh and see it is made up of vibrant light pixels—or even look into a hard, solid, "dead" rock and realize it's full of hectic particles of light moving like a sea of jittering termites!

    In the following quote the questioner asks how was the galaxy and planetary systems formed; to which Ra answers (from here on everything between parentheses in these quotes is mine):

    Quote:13.9 You must imagine a great leap of thought in this query, for at the last query the physical (i.e. space/time), as you call, it, universes were not yet born.

    The energies (i.e. of Love/the Logos) moved in increasingly intelligent patterns until the individualization of various energies emanating from the creative principle (i.e. Love/the Logos) of intelligent infinity became such as to be co-Creators (i.e. became individuated foci of consciousness as stars/suns). Thus the so-called physical matter began (i.e. when the stars/suns appeared). The concept of light is instrumental in grasping this great leap of thought as this vibrational distortion (i.e. light) of infinity is the building block of that which is known as matter, the light being intelligent and full of energy (i.e. full of love/intelligent energy), thus being the first distortion of intelligent infinity which was called by the creative principle (i.e. Love).

    In other words: what you call “matter” is light—albeit in its, shall we say… “brute form.” And I reiterate: the concept of light is instrumental in understanding light is the building block of “matter.”

    The questioner now asks what causes the rotation (i.e. energy motions/vibration of Love) so that light condenses into physical or chemical elements. In other words, how does Love, or the Logos, create “matter” through the material known as light? Ra answers as follows:

    Quote: 28.5 It is necessary to consider the enabling function of the focus known as Love (Love = focus of Intelligent Infinity in Its free-will, yielding intelligent energy). This energy (i.e. Love/the Logos) is of an ordering nature. It orders in a cumulative way from greater to lesser so that when Its universe, as you may call it, is complete, the manner of development (i.e. evolution) of each detail is inherent in the living light (i.e. matter) and thus will develop (i.e. evolve) in such and such a way[...]

    In other words, Love/the Logos/focus of intelligent energy orders or organizes its light material from greater to lesser, finer to denser if you like (or from “etheric” to “material,” if you prefer), so that when the universe is complete (i.e. ready to be experienced), the manner of development (i.e. evolution) of is inherent in the living light (i.e. matter, material, the physical bodies) and thus will develop (i.e. evolve) in such and such a way (i.e. 1st density leading to 2nd leading to 3rd leading to 4th and so on).


    Light in Relation to Evolution, Harvest & Graduation from Density to Density

    Now let us explore light in relation to evolution, harvest and graduation from density to density. As we go along you will remember that each density represents the recapitulation of Intelligent Infinity in Its discovery of awareness—each density being of a certain vibratory intensity/quality, or apportion of light (i.e. of separation of white light into distinct colors) and that graduation/harvest from one density to the next lies in an entity’s ability to use, welcome, and enjoy a certain intensity of the white light (i.e. in order to graduate to 4th density one needs be able to use, welcome and enjoy the green-ray intensity of light). Also pay attention to the word “illusion” as we’ll get into that later.

    Quote:28.2 This information may be of aid here. We speak now nonspecifically to increase the depth of your conceptualization of the nature of what is. The universe in which you live is recapitulation in each part of intelligent infinity. Thus you will see the same patterns repeated in physical and metaphysical areas; the rays or apportions of light (i.e. densities) being, as you surmise, those areas of what you may call the physical illusion which rotate, vibrate, or are of a nature that may be, shall we say, counted or categorized in rotation manner in space/time[...]

    Evolution (i.e. the process back to the One Infinite Creator) begins with a planet commences the first density experience (red-ray vibratory light spectrum):

    Quote:13.16 Each step recapitulates intelligent infinity in its discovery of awareness. In a planetary environment all begins in what you would call chaos, energy undirected and random in its infinity. Slowly, in your terms of understanding, there forms a focus of self-awareness (i.e. planetary sphere as a focus of energy/love—not yet manifested/materialized into light—being only a vortex of energy). Thus the Logos moves. Light comes to form the darkness (i.e. the planet “materializes” or "forms" in 1st density), according to the co-Creator’s patterns and vibratory rhythms, so constructing a certain type of experience. This begins with first density which is the density of consciousness, the mineral and water life upon the planet learning from fire and wind the awareness of being. This is the first density.

    1st density harvest: graduation to 2nd

    Here, Ra is describing how 1st-density chemical (atomic/molecular) substances combine so as to become/evolve into 2nd-density cellular organisms (i.e. which is basically organized 1st-density material). This is 2nd-density harvest.

    Quote:41.10 As the vibratory energies move from red to orange the vibratory environment is such as to stimulate those chemical substances (of 1st-density material/elements/entities) which lately had been inert to combine in such a fashion that love and light begin the function of growth (i.e. 2nd-density cellular organisms).

    2nd density harvest: graduation into 3rd

    The questioner now asks how did native 2nd-density entities graduate to 3rd density. Ra answers:

    Quote: 14.2 There was […] the simple third-density investment which is the line of spiraling light calling distortion upward from density to density.


    In other words, when 2nd-density entity was able to use, welcome and enjoy a greater intensity of light (i.e. yellow-ray), graduation took place, and the 2nd-density being became a 3rd-density being (with the proper bodily reconfiguration/evolvement).

    3rd density harvest: graduation to 4th

    Quote:82. 29 The necessity for graduation to fourth density is an ability to use, welcome, and enjoy a certain intensity of the white light (i.e. this “certain intensity” being fourth-density light, or the green-ray spectrum of the white light) of the One Infinite Creator.

    In other words, for a 3rd-density entity to graduate to 4th-density it needs be able to use, welcome, and enjoy green-ray, or 4th-density, light; just as 1st-density entity needs to be able to use, welcome, and enjoy orange-ray light in order to graduate to 2nd-density.

    It continues:

    Quote:[...]the measurement would be that of an entity walking up a set of your stairs, each of which was imbued with a certain quality of light. The stair upon which an entity stopped would be either third-density light or fourth-density light. Between the two stairs lies the threshold. To cross that threshold is difficult. There is resistance at the edge, shall we say, of each density. The faculty of faith or will needs to be understood, nourished, and developed in order to have an entity which seeks past the boundary of third density. Those entities which do not do their homework, be they ever so amiable, shall not cross.

    Here, the evolutionary experience of the Creation is likened to a set of stairs—which is most appropriate—; each step (i.e. density) being corresponded to a certain quality or intensity of light, there being a distinct boundary between one color and the next (red, orange, yellow, green, etc). In other words, although there is somewhat of a blending between thresholds, there is a distinct experiential difference between one density and another—and the crossing requires an actual effort (an impulse, a desire, a certain force of will) from the entity's part.

    Quote:13.17 The spiraling energy, which is the characteristic of what you call “light,” moves in straight line spiral thus giving spirals an inevitable vector upwards to a more comprehensive beingness with regards to intelligent infinity (i.e. each density-experience strives towards using, welcoming, and enjoying an ever greater intensity of light—this is the red-to-violet evolutionary journey. This is the recapitulation Ra speaks of). Thus, first dimensional beingness (i.e. 1st density) strives towards the second-density lessons of a type of awareness which includes growth rather than dissolution or random change.

    Quote:13.18 Picture, if you will, the difference between first-vibrational mineral or water life and the lower second-density beings which begin to move about within and upon its being. This movement is the characteristic of second density, the striving towards light and growth (i.e. 2nd-density orange-ray light).


    Quote:71.2 The connection between polarization and harvestability is most important in third-density harvest. In this density an increase in the serving of others or the serving of self will almost inevitably increase the ability of an entity to enjoy an higher intensity of light (i.e. green-ray light).

    4th-density harvest: graduation to 5th

    Quote:47.6 The qualifications for fifth density, however, involve understanding. This then, becomes the primary qualification for graduation from fourth to fifth density. To achieve this graduation the entity must be able to understand the actions, the movements, and the dance. There is no percentage describable which measures this understanding. It is a measure of efficiency of perception. It may be measured by light. The ability to love, accept, and use a certain intensity of light (i.e blue-ray) thus creates the requirement for both positive and negative fourth to fifth harvesting.

    Quote:48.6 There is very little work in consciousness in fourth and in fifth densities compared to the work done in third density. The work that is accomplished in positive fourth is that work whereby the positive social memory complex, having, through slow stages, harmoniously integrated itself, goes forth to aid those of less positive orientation which seek their aid. Thus their service is their work and through this dynamic between the societal self and the other-self which is the object of love, greater and greater intensities of understanding or compassion are attained. This intensity continues until the appropriate intensity (i.e. blue-ray) of the light may be welcomed. This is fourth-density harvest.

    In other words:

    Quote:3.10 The progress is normally from the understanding which you now seek to a dimension of understanding (i.e. green-ray light/4D) which is governed by the laws of love (i.e. green-ray light/4D), and which seeks the laws of light (i.e. blue-ray light/5D). Those who are vibrating with the Law of Light (i.e. blue-ray light/5D) seek the Law of One (i.e. indigo-ray light/6D). Those who vibrate with the Law of One seek the Law of Foreverness (i.e. violet-ray light/7D).

    In sum: the readiness for graduation from one density to the next lies in the entity’s ability to use, welcome and enjoy a greater quality of light—this is in turn determined by the strength of will, or desire, that fuels the entity in its seeking to "cross the threshold." There is nothing arbitrary that determines the “readiness” to graduate from one density to the next—it is solely determined by the entity's ability to use, welcome and enjoy a greater quality of light.


    Light in Relation to Black Holes

    I’ve said this before: black holes are inwardly turned stars; that is to say, light is being absorbed inwards rather than radiated outwards at this point. In other words, the black hole is the gateway back into the Creator (that there is a super-massive black hole in the center of the galaxy remains to be proven or dis-proven—I leave that to your own contemplation).

    Quote:29.18 [...]when all of creation in its infinity has reached a spiritual gravitational mass of sufficient nature (late-7th density), the entire creation infinitely coalesces; the light seeking and finding its source (i.e. Love, the Logos) and thusly ending the creation and beginning a new creation much as you consider the black hole, as you call it, with its conditions of infinitely great mass at the zero point from which no light may be seen as it has been absorbed.
    (There is another quote on the black hole in Post #4 below.)

    Remember this: from that focus/con-centration of intelligent energy we call Love was light emanated in the beginning, and into that great original thought of Love must light be absorbed once again in the end. This is the will of the Creator for all infinity; the ebb and the flow, the rhythms and the heartbeat of Creation: radiating/unfolding outwards and thus commencing the Creative experience, and subsequently absorbing/drawing/folding back all inwards and thus ending the Creation. The Creation ends as it begins: in Mystery. And Infinity is free to continues to create infinitely in an ever-present now.


    Light in Relation to Bodies

    Let’s get something clear: I use the term body strictly to refer to the space/time vehicle used in each density, be that 1st, 3rd, or 6th density. To the best of my knowledge, all bodies are constructs of physical light and operate in space/time.

    I’ll make this short using two quotes only:

    Quote:11.15 The one you speak of as Genghis Khan, at present, is incarnate in a physical light body which has the work of disseminating material of thought control to those who are what you may call crusaders.

    Prior to this, Ra had said that the entity who had been known as Genghis Khan in a 3rd-density incarnation on this planet was now incarnated as a 4th-density entity. What I wanted to note here is that Ra stated this quite clearly: incarnate in a physical light body. That is to say, the space/time body (i.e. physical) is made of light.

    In the following quote Ra is talking about a 5th-density entity:

    Quote:67.6 This query is not particularly simple to answer due to the transdimensional nature, not only of space/time to time/space, but from density to density. The time/space light or fifth-density body is used while the space/time fifth-density body remains in fifth density. The assumption that the consciousness is projected thereby is correct. The assumption that this conscious vehicle attached to the space/time fifth-density physical complex is that vehicle which works in this particular service is correct.

    The only thing I wanted to pluck out of this quote is that the 5th-density entity has both a space/time (physical) body and a time/space (metaphysical) analog. I don’t like to use the term “body” for time/space because the so-called “astral” or “light body” does not serve the functions of a body and lacks all the necessary characteristics of what constitutes a body, properly speaking. (If you practice “astral projection” you should have already learned you don’t even need a “body” in the inner, time/space, metaphysical planes; and that this “astral body”—which you can do away with at any time and just move about as “body-less” mind/spirit consciousness—cannot be properly be called a “body” as such).

    I’ll leave you two more quotes to ponder:

    Quote:54.6 [...] although it is true that each true-color vehicle is available potentially there is skill and discipline needed in order to avail the self of the more advanced or lighter vehicles.

    If the more advanced bodies are lighter vehicles, the less advanced bodies are, well, less lighter vehicles (i.e. matter).

    Quote:59.24 [...] the grosser or less dense materials will be pulled into conformation with the denser and lighter energies which give your Logos its proceedings through the realms of experience.

    Remember this: light = original material. “Matter” is not something “other than” light—just light in its grosser, coarser, rougher form. You may see 1st through mid-4th density as the “grosser” half of the light spectrum, and mid-4th density to 7th as the “finer” half. 4th density is right in between the lesser/lower densities and the greater/higher. 4th density may also be seen as the balance-point (50/50) between physical or space/time and metaphysical or time/space. As entities progress through the evolutionary spiral ascending inwards, metaphysical reality progressively begins to play a greater role (just as space/time plays a greater role in the lower densities).


    Light in Relation to Illusion(s)

    Quote:13.9 This light of love was made to have in its occurrences of being certain characteristics, among them the infinite whole paradoxically described by the straight line, as you would call it. This paradox is responsible for the shape of the various physical illusion entities you call solar systems, galaxies, and planets, all revolving and tending towards the lenticular.

    Plain and simple: solar systems, galaxies, and planets, are all referred to as physical illusions. Also notice that Ra says “the light of love;” reaffirming the fact that light is the product, the result, the manifestation of love, which is a kinetic focus of intelligent energy; the Original Thought, or the Logos (i.e. focus or con-centration of energy).

    Quote:27.17 The nature of the vibratory patterns of your universe is dependent upon the configurations placed upon the original material or light (again: light = the original material) by the focus or Love (again, Love = focus, con-centration) using Its intelligent energy to create a certain pattern of illusions or densities (read again: densities = illusions) in order to satisfy Its own intelligent estimate of a method of knowing Itself. Thus the colors, as you call them, are as strait, or narrow, or necessary as is possible to express, given the will of Love.

    Re-worded: the nature of the vibratory patterns (that make up the densities) of the universe is determined by the focus or Love (again, Love = focus) using intelligent energy (which is basically Love in action directed by free-will) to configure the original material or light (again, light = the original material) to create a certain pattern of illusions or densities (again, densities = illusions).

    Quote:13.13 Thus, each solar system has its own, shall we say, local coordinate system of illusory natural laws. It shall be understood that any portion, no matter how small, of any density or illusory pattern (again, density = illusory pattern) contains, as in an holographic picture, the One Creator which is infinity. Thus all begins and ends in mystery.

    Again, here we see the definition of densities as illusory patterns. Also notice how each solar system is said to have its own local coordinate of illusory natural laws. In other words: natural laws of physics (or metaphysics, for that matter) are also illusory. As Ra said:

    Quote:70.17 [...]time/space is no more homogenous than space/time. It is as complex and complete a system of illusions, dances, and pattern as is space/time and has as structured a system of what you may call natural laws.
    (And remember, natural laws are illusory too.)

    Now, more importantly:

    Quote:6.14 Thus, the illusion is created of light, or more properly but less understandably, light/love. This is in varying degrees of intensity.

    Here Ra states, quite clearly, that the illusion is created of light (by the will of Love) in varying degrees of intensity (i.e. red-, orange-, yellow-, green-ray, etc). In other words, the undistorted, pure, clear white light is diffracted or separated; this separation into “apportions” of light result in the illusory vibratory spectra that are the densities we experience through the Creation.

    So what is an illusion? Simple: everything that is not (though apparent rather than real) Intelligent Infinity in Its unpotentiated, boundless, formless state of undistorted, undifferentiated, indivisible Infinity, or Oneness, is, in some way, form, shape, or fashion, an illusion. The “appearance” of something else, something paradoxically “other than,” is the illusion.

    There is only One of us here, and yet, we are (paradoxically and seemingly) many. This “manyness,” this “differentiation” from One (again, apparent rather than real) is an illusion. “Variousness” is an illusion. And the illusion is created of light (by the diffractions of light rotating/vibrating at varying frequencies creating form and shape and color and pattern and various states of "materiality").

    Thus, from the 3rd distortion (light) come many, many possible distortions which create all the illusory patterns we see; both in space/time as well as time/space. We live in a dream within a dream within a dream. And what we infinitely seek (whether knowingly or unknowingly) is the Dreamer—the Creator—to discover, to experience, that we were/are/always shall be the Dreamer dreaming the dream of Itself. This is the only purpose of the Creation: the experience and the journey. The goal is not necessarily to terminate the illusion, but to experience the journey in awe, wonder and enjoyment until the Creator has been fulfilled with Its own experience of Itself.

    In order for this experience to be possible at all, the Creator needs to somehow differentiate Itself from Itself infinitely in order to gain an equally infinite experience of Itself for all infinity. The only way this is possible is to invest Itself in the exploration of illusory shapes and forms and patterns (which, again, are apparent rather than real—because Intelligent Infinity in its unpotentiated, undistorted, undifferentiated state never ceases BEING unpotentiated, undistorted and undifferentiated Infinity, or Oneness—and that is why all of this is an illusion, a kaleidoscopic holographic dream within the imagination of Infinite Intelligence).

    Thus, I reiterate once again in the most literal sense: everything you see or otherwise imagine is created of the only material there is: Light—the manifestation of Love (which is a kinetic focus or thought of pure motion, or energy, directed by the free-will of Intelligent Infinity—wherein lies all potentiality, all possibility and all infinity of being).

    And though we are aware (to varying degrees of awareness) that “separation” is an illusion, we yet remain very much separated and individuated (are you not an in-divide-dual, after all?). Why is this so? Because we are dancing thoughts in an illusory ballroom of light.

    Free-will, love and light are the three distortions of Intelligent Infinity. Intelligent Infinity is All There Is. Everything else is an illusion. The illusion ends just as a long stage play must have a conclusion...

    Quote:104.26 And throughout the grand illusion and the following and the following there is the undergirding majesty of the One Infinite Creator. All is well. Nothing is lost. Go forth rejoicing in the love and the light, the peace and the power of the One Infinite Creator.

    There is no end to your beingness—because there is no beginning.

    There is only being.

    And you are.

    Returning to the one un-diffracted white light will dissolve this Grand Illusion and end this Creation. Light will find its source; that is: Love. And that one great Original Thought will, by free-will, de-focalize, shall we say, into a... for lack of a better word, non-thought or thoughlessness (i.e. cessation of activity, motion, vibration) and return to a state of unpotentiatedness once again.

    Without illusion, there is no Creation; and hence no experiential reality.

    The Creator shall know Itself.

    ***

    Hopefully, this clears up the erroneous mis-understanding that “illusion” is somehow “bad” or “negative” or "undesirable," and also "amend" the mis-perception that "matter" is something "other than" light.

    PS: I could add quotes from the Q'uo transcripts at a later time to support and expand on this subject.

    Print this item

    Pages (165): « Previous 1 … 117 118 119 120 121 … 165 Next »
     

    Forum Statistics
    » Members: 12,007
    » Latest member: Phantomy
    » Forum threads: 15,903
    » Forum posts: 300,175

    Full Statistics

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media