Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Portal

    Latest Threads
    A Comprehensive Analysis ...
    Forum: Science & Technology
    Last Post: the
    08-06-2022, 09:25 AM
    » Replies: 495
    » Views: 450,981
    The mysterious nature of ...
    Forum: Olio
    Last Post: Confused
    08-06-2022, 07:14 AM
    » Replies: 16,731
    » Views: 8,318,358
    How genuine is your inten...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 03:53 AM
    » Replies: 28
    » Views: 66,150
    Choosing polarities, surv...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 12:07 AM
    » Replies: 25
    » Views: 33,507
    what music are you listen...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: schubert
    08-05-2022, 11:51 PM
    » Replies: 3,650
    » Views: 2,652,617
    What youtube video are yo...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 08:24 PM
    » Replies: 502
    » Views: 323,559
    Are you going to take the...
    Forum: Health & Diet
    Last Post: zedro
    08-05-2022, 07:17 PM
    » Replies: 2,075
    » Views: 1,467,381
    Daily Q'uote
    Forum: L/L Research Channeling Archives
    Last Post: omcasey
    08-05-2022, 03:43 PM
    » Replies: 2,593
    » Views: 1,900,984
    what movie did you last w...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 09:11 AM
    » Replies: 386
    » Views: 510,099
    All-Time Favourite Hits o...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 04:20 AM
    » Replies: 39
    » Views: 42,069

    Search Forums

    (Advanced Search)

      Seniority of vibration
    Posted by: zenmaster - 02-08-2011, 10:34 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (33)

    Quote:17.43 ...
    The seniority by vibration is the preferential treatment, shall we say, which follows the ways of the Law of One which encourages harvestable individuals, each individual becoming aware of the time of harvest and the need on a self-level to bend mind/body/spirit towards the learn/teaching of these lessons, by giving them priority in order that an entity may have the best possible chance, shall we say, in succeeding in this attempt.
    ...

    Quote:21.9 Questioner: At this time in our cycle, near the end, what percentage of the entities incarnating are making their own choices?
    Ra: I am Ra. The approximate percentage is fifty-four percent.

    It is interesting that even with all of the harvestable entities being able to 'cut the line', only 54 percent of incarnate entities have reached the point of simply being able to make their own choices, after 75,000 years on Earth, and, for a great many, an additional thousands of years on 3D Mars. So maybe 125,000+ years?

    One would think that disharmonious circumstances would offer a lot of catalyst, due to dissatisfaction. However, that does not seem to be the case. On the contrary, there must indeed be a lot of satisfaction present, on the whole. I wonder what reinforces that?

    Presumably, the lack of polarization was due to lack of opportunity of some kind. From the material, it seems that lack of sufficient leisure time has a significant stifling effect on evolution.

    Print this item

      The One Infinite Creator... Entity, or linguistic placeholder?
    Posted by: Lavazza - 02-08-2011, 05:12 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (6)

    This is something I've thought quite a bit about- but would love to hear your opinions / perspectives.

    L/L
    Eric

    Print this item

      Giants
    Posted by: Spectrum - 02-08-2011, 04:11 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (51)

    Moderator Note: These posts were split from another thread, Why the word Adonai?

    Thanks for the link, Peregrinus.

    I don't want to go off topic here, but was Yahweh/Yod-Heh-Shin-Vau-Heh also a social memory complex when it/they walked among the Egyptians, the way Ra was a group (many entities from the Confederation) who were in Egypt, as opposed to a single entity?

    Quote:Ra: I am Ra. There were two other techniques used: one by the entity no longer called Yahweh, who still felt that if it could raise up entities which were superior to the negative forces, that these superior entities could spread the Law of One. Thus this entity, “Yod-Heh-Shin-Vau-Heh,” came among your people in form according to incarnate being and mated in the normal reproductive manner of your physical complexes, thus birthing a generation of much larger beings, these beings called “Anak.”

    The above I would assume refers to these bible verses:

    Quote:Genesis 6:1-4

    6:1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

    6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

    6:3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

    6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

    The 'sons of God' would imply that they were also many, like Ra.

    Print this item

      Red ray blockage?
    Posted by: rva_jeremy - 02-07-2011, 12:47 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (43)

    I've seen people mention blockage in the red ray in this forum. Is this, in fact, possible? I thought those of Ra stressed that blockage was not possible in the red and violet rays. Maybe I'm mistaken.

    Print this item

      Second-Density Love
    Posted by: Ens Entium - 02-05-2011, 06:55 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (21)

    This intrigues me

    Quote:43.31 Questioner: I was really trying to get at whether it would be of great importance to construct a better place for our meditations. We have distractions here of the types which I mentioned, and I know that it is a function of our total free will as to whether we construct this or not, but I was trying to get at the principles behind and the relative importance of the Faraday cage. It would be quite a construction and I was wondering if it would be of any real value?

    Ra: I am Ra. Without infringing upon free will we feel it possible to state that the Faraday cage and the isolation tank are gadgets.

    The surrounding of self in a sylvan atmosphere, apart from distractions, in a place of working used for no other purpose, in which you and your associates agree to lay aside all goals but that of the meditative seeking of the Infinite Creator is, shall we say, not gadgetry but the making use of the creation of the Father in second-density love, and in the love and support of otherselves. Are there any brief queries before this working is at an end?

    second-density love..??

    What do you think Ra meant by this?

    Any comments/answers are appreciated.

    Print this item

      The Law of Responsibility
    Posted by: Confused - 02-03-2011, 01:58 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (40)

    In LOO 101.8, Ra says the following -

    Quote:We may only suggest that the honor of propinquity to light carries with it the Law of Responsibility.

    I find the concept of the Law of Responsibility very interesting and suitable for study, given the times of discord that we generally live in. Ra spoke about the concept of the 'Law of Responsibility' in the context of refraining "from contumely and discord in all things", while yet finding "love within truth", in terms of personal relationships. The honor of being close to the light brings the responsibility of developing and maintaining harmonious relationships is the subtext that I see. Any remarks?

    Please note that the text within quotation marks have all been lifted from 101.8.

    Print this item

      Questions regarding...
    Posted by: Joseph326 - 01-31-2011, 01:03 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (10)

    Ra 78.24:
    "In sixth density, the
    density of unity, the positive
    and negative paths must needs
    take in each other for all now
    must be seen as love/light and
    light/love. This is not difficult
    for the positive polarity which
    sends love and light to all
    other-selves. It is difficult
    enough for service-to-self
    polarized entities that at some
    point the negative polarity is
    abandoned."

    Does this mean that we should be aware that the negative polarity is comprised of just as much love/light and light/love of the Creator as positive polarity? Does it serve us to be aware of this now, in third and early fourth density? Or is this not meant to be understood until late sixth density? If space/time and time/space both make up sixth density, and we each are a part of our higher selves which reside in sixth density, then are we existing in 6d right now? Is our awareness only as limited as we choose it to be?

    Is it truly the nature of positive polarity to reject the negative, or to love all other selves unconditionally? Should this be happening now, or does one 'wait' until 6D before truly accepting, loving and serving all? Is it appropriate for one to operate with a 6d understanding while still in 3d, if that is possible? And would that provide service here at all, or is polarity necessary to do that?

    Just a few questions that came to mind when reading this part of the Ra material. I was hoping to see what ideas this would generate in order to add to my, and others' understanding. I could go on with more, but figured this is enough for nowSmile

    Print this item

      Entities from Orion
    Posted by: Crown - 01-31-2011, 09:14 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (76)

    Hello friends.

    I am reading alot lately and i came to a conclusion that if i want to be positively polarized and serve others,
    i need to get to know the "other" side good enough so i can discern and choose between the two.
    Even though in my concious mind i have already chose the STO path rather than the STS, but i would still like to make things more clear.

    Basically my questions are: Entities like Nebadon, Lucifer and Satan. Are they from Orion?
    The entity which we call the devil, and its' family, are they simply negatively oriented and polarized enitities from the Orion group?

    How do you deal with what seems to be a negatively oriented contact?
    I personally imagine a shield and block myself from my surroundings and i say things like "Leave me alone, i love you" and procceed into calling my positively oriented friends for love and light.

    Im sorry if this has been asked / answered before. I would like to recieve some information, thank you.

    Print this item

      Moving Mountains
    Posted by: Gribbons - 01-31-2011, 01:50 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (21)

    Purely hypothetical talk here, but I just had this thought, as I contemplate many spiritual ideas before I go to bed, and this one piqued my curiosity regarding Jesus' saying you can have powers as I do, and more, by way of the Holy Spirit. (With a mustard seed of faith, one can move mountains)

    I combined this thought with an experience I had my first time experiencing the "magic" in mushrooms. I saw words, sentences, streaming endlessly through the sky. Fully legible and readable at the time, but while I remember thinking I should write this down or speak into a recorder, the thought immediately faded into, no, just live in it. I wanted to live in the moment as I was full of love and worth, but it made sense to me that I could see the Word all around me, like, everything that was WAS a thought, a word, a sentence. Now, I also linked that idea to this one concept I heard, it might have been mentioned by Ra, that old languages, primarily sanskrit and maybe hebrew, had their language vibrate to a frequency that was more in-tune with the "words" or the vibrations that everything is comprised of.

    So thinking of that, my thought was, oh, that sounds like very high 5th chakra work, as that is communication, but I suppose 6th chakra work, indigo work, is comprised of love AND communication, and is also known for making direct contact with the creator and all it's creation. The love aspect of indigo work would also coincide with Jesus's said faith needed to move mountains, or anything, as I posit.

    So what do you think? Let's say you were doing indigo work and you wanted to move an object with your mind, would you do it with focus and love or love with some sort of oral communication that resonates with the vibration of the object? Almost like, dare I say, a spell. Wingardium Leviosa! (to those who read harry potter Wink )

    Print this item

      Relationship between Dewey Larson and Don/Carla
    Posted by: greyWiz - 01-27-2011, 11:09 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (11)

    Hi, I was reading the preface of Dewey Larson's The Universe of Motion, when I've found this statement at the very end:

    Quote:It will not be feasible to acknowledge all of the many individual contributions that have been made toward developing the details of thc theoretical system and bringing it to the attention of the scientific community. However, I will say that I am particularly indebted to the founders of the New Science Advocates, Dr. Douglas S. Cramer, Dr. Paul F. de Lespinasse, and Dr. George W. Hancock; to Dr. Frank A, Anderson, the current President of the NSA, who did the copy editing for this volume, along with his many other contributions; and to the past and present members of the NSA Executive Board: Steven Berline, RonaId F. Blackburn, Frances Boldereff, James N. Brown, Jr., Lawrence Denslow, Donald T. Elkins, Rainer Huck, Todd Kelso, Richard L. Long, Frank H. Meyer, William J. Mitchell, Harold Norris, Carla Rueckert, Ronald W. Satz, George Windolph, and Hans F. Wuenscher.

    Here's the link:
    http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/nbm/nbm00pre.htm

    I guess this book is from 1979, so what was the relationship between Dewey, Don and Carla at that time, in order to cite them in the acknowledgments?

    Is there a chance of Dewey being influenced by Don and Carla's works?

    Thanks in advance! Smile

    Print this item

    Pages (165): « Previous 1 … 140 141 142 143 144 … 165 Next »
     

    Forum Statistics
    » Members: 12,007
    » Latest member: Phantomy
    » Forum threads: 15,903
    » Forum posts: 300,175

    Full Statistics

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media