Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Portal

    Latest Threads
    A Comprehensive Analysis ...
    Forum: Science & Technology
    Last Post: the
    08-06-2022, 09:25 AM
    » Replies: 495
    » Views: 456,136
    The mysterious nature of ...
    Forum: Olio
    Last Post: Confused
    08-06-2022, 07:14 AM
    » Replies: 16,731
    » Views: 8,406,645
    How genuine is your inten...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 03:53 AM
    » Replies: 28
    » Views: 66,550
    Choosing polarities, surv...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 12:07 AM
    » Replies: 25
    » Views: 34,076
    what music are you listen...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: schubert
    08-05-2022, 11:51 PM
    » Replies: 3,650
    » Views: 2,683,995
    What youtube video are yo...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 08:24 PM
    » Replies: 502
    » Views: 327,969
    Are you going to take the...
    Forum: Health & Diet
    Last Post: zedro
    08-05-2022, 07:17 PM
    » Replies: 2,075
    » Views: 1,486,900
    Daily Q'uote
    Forum: L/L Research Channeling Archives
    Last Post: omcasey
    08-05-2022, 03:43 PM
    » Replies: 2,593
    » Views: 1,925,325
    what movie did you last w...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 09:11 AM
    » Replies: 386
    » Views: 514,182
    All-Time Favourite Hits o...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 04:20 AM
    » Replies: 39
    » Views: 42,659

    Search Forums

    (Advanced Search)

      A Person's Ethical Focus, Range and Volatility
    Posted by: 4Dsunrise - 01-17-2016, 04:49 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (10)

    4dphilosophyproject (at) gmail.com
    If you have a serious interest in developing the IUP/AOP and producing a philosophical treatise and curriculum for mainstream university study send an email. Elaborate on what your goals are and what specific interests you may have related to this project.


    A Person's Ethical Focus, Range and Volatility

    Note: This is a very deep and complex subject with much to question and to research, and my ideas are speculative at best -- but they provide a start for discussion.

    1. One motivation for this topic is that in AstroPsychology there is a need for archetypal factors to describe ethical values and ethical polarity and their affect on a person's psyche and life. It may lead to a system similar to the MBS model of the Tarot Archetypes.

    2. Another motivation is that the qualitative and quantitative nature of STO and STS needs more research and more fleshing out as a comprehensive ethical theory that integrates ethical polarity with psychology. 

    Since Service to Self/Other applies well intentions to gain polarity, it seems natural to consider that Disservice to Self/Other applies ill intentions to lose polarity. These complementary opposites can be abbreviated as DTS and DTO. 

    There are people who are STO/DTS and STS/DTO while there are people who are STO/STS and STS/STO. 

    STO/DTS care about others but have persecution complexes and self-loathe.
    STS/DTO care about self but are sadistic and cruel towards others
    STO/STS are more caring toward others but still care about self
    STS/STO are more caring toward self but still care about others

    3. The final motivation is indicated by the excerpt below where the Ra group say that between 51% STO and 95% STS is "the sinkhole of indifference" plus a surprising remark about "effort to attain" 51% STO vs 95% STS.

    session 17

    Quote:Don: Why is the negative path so much more difficult to attain harvestability upon than the 
    positive?

    Ra: This is due to a distortion of the Law of One which indicates that the gateway to intelligent infinity be a gateway at the end of a straight and narrow path as you may call it.

    To attain 51% dedication to the welfare of other-selves is as difficult as attaining a grade of 5% dedication to otherselves. [51% STO and 95% STS are the SAME in difficulty to attain] The, shall we say, sinkhole of indifference is between those two. 

    I want to first address the "sinkhole of indifference" that should motivate Metaphysical Psychologists who are interested in how the ethical focus, range and volatility of polarity affects the psychological stability and integrity of 3D/4D people and Wanderers.

    There's a lot of psychological distortion, volatility and imbalance taking place among both groups that leads to some of the clinical conditions ie bipolar, borderline personality, manic depressive, schizoid, etc. So what role does ethical polarity play towards psychological health?

    That's a big unknown which the Metaphysical Psychologist will try to address.  And later in the post the Metaphysical Philosopher will try to address the "sinkhole of indifference" and "equal difficulty to attain" in terms of LOO and AOP.

    So first, what is the psychological meaning of a person's ethical focus, range and volatility of polarity?

    It's about the focus, range and volatility of a person's ethical intention and motivation which, in turn, affects one's willingness and capacity to express sincere care and concern for oneself and for others, and the opposite -- of sincere antipathy and coldheartedness for oneself and for others. So this has obvious STS/STO and DTS/DTO implications.

    One approach to describing the ethical nature of a person is the probability/possibility vortex or cyclonic model.

    For example, an "ethically stable and grounded" person is like a well formed and tight spinning vortex or cyclone with a small central core that indicates the "central" polarity of said person at say, for instance, 60% STS. 

    So therefore this person is 60/40 STS/STO who experiences relative inner stability and low volatility as she works on becoming more self-empowered and self-developed towards 95% STS. 

    What about DTO and DTS? To reach 95% STS she may begin to consciously assert DTO while consciously correcting and eliminating DTS. This inner and outer work process is done on a totality self level to address the many incarnations of karmic choices, lessons and programming.

    Just for illustration, let's say for this incarnation she's an attractive and wealthy Yoga instructor who has Hollywood elites as clients. She's learning to use personal and esoteric power to manipulate others and is becoming open to consciously hurting others to gain more power. She has some self-doubts and vacillation but it's within her control.

    So is she in a so-called "sinkhole of indifference" if she is motivated towards 95% STS?

    Getting back to the vortex model and its features. The smaller the core the greater the focus. The tighter and smaller the diameter of the vortex the smaller the range. And the more well formed and symmetric the vortex the less volatility within this range. 

    Now, the vortex model is a nice visual and can be further developed into something multidimensional, but another common mathematical model is the probability distribution graph which makes the shape of a bumpy hill or mountain to indicate ethical focus, range and volatility.

    This is an easier model to work with since we can use probability terms ie mean (average), median (middle), mode (most frequent) -- which determines focus -- and interval range and variance to determine range and volatility.

    Using the above example, the Yoga instructor has her focus at 60% STS and a range of 
    [57 - 63] with low volatility or variability of polarity. So she is focused, balanced and stable and doesn't have wild swings of feelings related to variable ethical polarity -- no crisis of conscience or guilt trips. She's aware that she wants to polarize towards 95% STS.

    Her graph looks like a steep, narrow and symmetrical mountain with the peak centered over 60% STS and a base or interval range of [57 - 63]. It's analogous to the tightly spinning and symmetrical vortex model.

    As another example, for an unstable and vacillating Wanderer with guilt issues, his graph may look like an irregular, asymmetrical and broad hill with a loosely focused peak centered over 54% STO with an interval range of [40 - 60]. 

    So he has wild swings into STS territory with over-corrections swinging back to STO. 

    Given this ethical volatility he is more prone to DTO and DTS activity and psychological issues ie bipolar and manic depression with homicidal and suicidal thoughts.  

    So using this Ethical Polarity evaluation to better understand AstroPsychology dynamics and archetypes leads to potential new discoveries in Depth Psychology or what can be called Metaphysical Psychology. This may prove to be useful in early 4D. 

    We can end this part with some questions.

    How does one's ethical focus correlate to ethic intention and motivation, and, in turn,  affect one's psychological states? 

    How does ethical range and volatility correlate with inner and outer tensions and conflicts, and, in turn, guilt and crisis of conscience? 

    The Ra group describe STO as strength of willingness and dedication to the welfare of Other over Self, and therefore describe STS as strength of willingness and dedication to the welfare of Self over Other. These determine ethical polarity.

    So, if "welfare" is replaced with "deprivation and dysfunction" does DTO and DTS then have valid metaphysical and psychological meaning and application in 3D and 4D?

    What about the "sinkhole of indifference" entailing indifference or neutrality of feeling?
    So therefore apathy and Non-service to Self/Other or NTS/NTO may also have validity and application? 

    That's a lot of food for thought and may be worth further research for the 4D Metaphysical Psychologist. 
    ------------------------------------------
    But going back to the Ra group excerpt and the Metaphysical Philosopher's research:

    The Ra group say that between 51% STO and 95% STS is "the sinkhole of indifference" plus a surprising remark about "effort to attain" 51% STO vs 95% STS.

    session 17

    Quote:Don: Why is the negative path so much more difficult to attain harvestability upon than the positive?

    Ra: This is due to a distortion of the Law of One which indicates that the gateway to intelligent infinity be a gateway at the end of a straight and narrow path as you may call it.

    To attain 51% dedication to the welfare of other-selves is as difficult as attaining a grade of 5% dedication to otherselves. [51% STO = 95% STS in difficulty] The, shall we say, sinkhole of indifference is between those two. 

    So, the surprise is that it's NOT easier to attain 51% STO than to attain 95% STS. They have the same difficulty.

    This then means that it is just as easy, or just as difficult, to be a Genghis Khan as to be a "caring and good" person. 


    So therefore, the effort and dedication it takes to consistently rape, slaughter and pillage is equivalent to the effort and dedication it takes to consistently give (just barely) a little more of one's self to helping others.

    If this is the case, then Don's question of "why is the negative path so much more difficult to attain harvestablity than the positive?" should have the answer that "It actually is NOT more difficult to attain 95% STS than 51% STO" -- given what the Ra group just said.

    Re-read the above excerpt carefully and, given the context, try to justify why that answer is not a valid answer. 

    So reading this excerpt caught me off guard b/c I always thought that it was easier to attain 51% STO given the 10:1 ratio of STO to STS in terms of mixed harvest populations and of SMC's. This was supported by the LOO claiming a slight bias to STO due to the natural harmony of unity.

    But if the LOO is slightly biased towards STO then shouldn't it be easier to attain 51% STO than 95% STS? It appears not to be, and that the reason for the 10:1 ratio has to do with the slight bias causing much larger numbers of 3D seekers to be attracted to the love and harmony of STO than to the riskier type of love and harmony of STS. 

    So that attraction doesn't mean that it is any easier to attain which is puzzling b/c I would think being drawn or attracted towards something would make it easier. So the equal difficulty to attain STO or STS is still puzzling.

    The AOP approach is this:

    In terms of the Tao principle and symbol, positive and negative are equivalent polarities of Yang and Yin. It's a beautifully balanced duality, but symbolically it's a duality within a circle that is an inclusive whole. This is the variation of "two within one" as a Dialectical Monism where, in a symmetrically complete form is  AOP = AO + OA = OA + AO = OAP and where AO or All is One is Yin, and OA or One is All is Yang.

    Given the equal and dynamic balance of complementary opposites, this translates to "equal difficulty to attain" whereas the slight bias to STO or OA relates to the inclusive wholeness of the circle b/c the Yang nature of OA or "infinified unity" strives to "posit or affirm" AO or "unified infinity" as shown in the 2nd part (OA + AO = OAP) of the above formula. This is the "return to source" process or so-called Original Thought.

    "Infinified unity" is intelligent unity which emerges from the Cardinal Octave to form our Fixed Octave, while "unified infinity" is intelligent infinity which emerges within our Fixed Octave to form the next Mutable Octave and for which we are drawn to access and evolve toward. 

    See What is Ra's Monism? 
    http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=10926

    Ra's Fundamental Postulates
    http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=10871

    To sum things up, AOP = AO + OA corresponds to the Original Impulse of the Creator to Know Self through experiencing form and function in the Fixed Octave, while OA + AO = OAP corresponds to the Original Thought of the Creator to Return to Self via the experience in the Fixed Octave to reach the Mutable Octave. This return to source has STO or OA intention and so is biased to create the 10:1 ratio.

    This is far from a complete and accurate account but attempts to make some sense of the ethical polarity dynamics. It opens up the topic for more discussion.

    Print this item

      Orange and Yellow Ray Interconnections
    Posted by: Plenum - 01-09-2016, 06:37 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (12)

    it has been observed in many places that there is a love-wisdom balance that can be worked on.  That is the green ray and the blue ray.  I think a similiar interplay can be seen the orange and yellow ray centres.  Here, it is less about respective balance, and more about a co-operative working.

    I'll post a few Ra quotes, that maybe show these interconnections between orange and yellow.

    / /

    Green ray (sexual) energy transfers being de-activated by thoughts of 'domination' - which Ra references as 'possession' type thoughts.

    This is mostly yellow-ray, but can overlap into orange.

    Quote:the green-ray activation is always vulnerable to the yellow or orange ray of possession, this being largely yellow ray but often coming into orange ray.

    Fear of possession, desire for possession, fear of being possessed, desire to be possessed: these are the distortions which will cause the deactivation of green-ray energy transfer.


    Rejection of yellow ray interactions, and choosing forms of 'isolation' (orange ray selfhood).  This is not STS, strictly speaking, as STS has a great desire to manipulate and engage with society to get their desired outcome.

    Quote:as the negatively polarized entity is working very intensively with the deepest manifestations of yellow-ray group energies, especially the manipulations of other-self for service to self. Those reverting to orange ray, and we may add these are many upon your plane at this time, are those who feel the vibrations of true color green and, therefore, respond by rejecting governmental and societal activities as such and seek once more the self.

    However, not having developed the yellow ray properly so that it balances the personal vibratory rates of the entity, the entity then is faced with the task of further activation and balancing of the self in relation to the self, thus the orange-ray manifestations at this space/time nexus.

    / /

    The orange-ray as expressing power on a personal level (one-to-one, small groups), and yellow-ray as being expressed power on a wide social level (government, propaganda, media, someone of influence, a position of authority).

    Quote:The orange ray is that influence or vibratory pattern wherein the mind/body/spirit expresses its power on an individual basis. Thus power over individuals may be seen to be orange ray. This ray has been quite intense among your peoples on an individual basis. You may see in this ray the treating of other-selves as non-entities, slaves, or chattel, thus giving other-selves no status whatever.

    The yellow ray is a focal and very powerful ray and concerns the entity in relation to, shall we say, groups, societies, or large numbers of mind/body/spirit complexes. This orange — we correct ourselves — this yellow-ray vibration is at the heart of bellicose actions in which one group of entities feel the necessity and right of dominating other groups of entities and bending their wills to the wills of the masters.

    Power is normally regarded as being a negative thing; and definitely the most prominent examples of 'power' being deployed are individuals who have abused power in positions of authority.  And yet, positive figures can also use power.  Think of FDR - a Wanderer.  Think of Lincoln - who had a walkin complete his task.  Think of Einstein and Schweitzer - both public figures who have left a legacy of positivity.  There was also General Patton.  Yellow ray can be empowered, and wielded in a positive sense.

    on Albert Schweitzer: "This entity’s yellow ray was bright and crystallized by the efforts needed to procure the funds to promulgate its efforts."

    on General Patton: "The one of whom you speak, known as George, was one in whom the programming of previous incarnations had created a pattern or inertia which was irresistible in its incarnation in your time/space. This entity was of a strong yellow-ray activation with frequent green-ray openings and occasional blue-ray openings. However, it did not find itself able to break the mold of previous traumatic experiences of a bellicose nature."

    (not sure where that bellicosity plays into it.  Is that part of the yellow ray activation he had?)

    / /

    Yellow Ray is one of the 'primary rays'.  Orange is a movement towards it.  That is not to disregard Orange as having it's own place and importance; but there is a linkage between these two energy centres.  Yin-yang.  Orange (2) (yin) (feminine), Yellow (3) (yang) (masculine-oriented).

    Ra Wrote:orange ray the movement towards yellow ray which is the ray of self-awareness and interaction.

    / /

    anyway, just a few thoughts.  If I've missed any relevant quotes, just add them to the thread Smile

    Print this item

      Densities of evolution
    Posted by: Nowheretoday - 01-04-2016, 01:20 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (5)

    I'm working on a sort of article where I try to explain the densities, I did an intro and went from first to fourth but I'm stuck with fifth to seventh pretty much because there isn't much info available, I was wondering if you guys could help me with some characteristics, personal interpretations of each one or maybe a sort of definition that I might be missing, something that could help me give them a better explanation, here's what I have. This is all quotes from the book, slightly modificated. Thanks.

    Fifth Density


    Fifth density is the density of light, wisdom or understanding. High levels of awareness and wisdom are attained in this density.

    Sixth Density

    Sixth density is the density of unity without polarity. The seeking of the Creator is done by shared experience; harvestability can only be reached through social memory complexes. The balance between compassion and wisdom allows the understanding of experience to be informed that entities can become closer to unity with the Creator.

    Seventh Density

    Seventh density is the density of timelessness or foreverness. At the seventh density, one becomes one with all, thus having no memory, no identity, no past or future, but existing in the all.

    Print this item

      intelligent energy
    Posted by: alamb3 - 12-22-2015, 09:52 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (13)

    Could you help me understand the difference between intelligent energy and intelligent infinity and what other iterations of intelligent...there are?
    Also wondered if anyone could help me understand what is the actual "gateway to intelligent infinty?
    Thank you!!

    Print this item

      The Cosmology of the IUP/LOO
    Posted by: 4Dsunrise - 12-20-2015, 04:38 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (3)

    If you have a serious interest in developing the IUP/AOP and producing a philosophical treatise and curriculum for mainstream university study send an email. Elaborate on what your goals are and what specific interests you may have related to this project.

    This thread idea comes from Gary's mention of his and Austin's project of an introduction to the Cosmology and Philosophy of LOO. This OP would have introduced, for comparison, some of the various cosmological models going back to the Vedas up through today. The comparative approach gives a good perspective but it would have been too long for an OP and so the most relevant model -- Vilenkin's Many Worlds in One -- is explored at the bottom.
     
    What is cosmology?

    1. A branch of metaphysics that deals with the Universe as an orderly system.
    2. A branch of astronomy that deals with the origin, structure and space-time relationships of the Universe.

    Both these aspects of cosmology can be addressed by the derivations arising from IUP = IU + UI. In this post I'm going to jump to the #2 astronomy branch because other threads ie What is Ra's Monism, Ra's Fundamental Postulates and Thoughts on will, love, light of Creator touch on the derivations of the metaphysical branch of cosmology.

    The metaphysical branch will be covered later and I will still need to employ metaphysical aspects to the physical and transphysical aspects of astronomy cosmology because, ultimately, the astronomy is derived from the metaphysical. 

    UI means Unity is Infinity and so Unity becomes Infinified in that it becomes dynamic and broadened.

    IU means Infinity is Unity and so Infinity becomes Unified and known as Intelligent Infinity (I*) but will be discussed in a later post that explores the metaphysical cosmology.

    Infinified Unity is Intelligent Unity (U*)

    1. Infinified Unity, in function form is I(U) = U* which is Intelligent Unity.

    I(U) = U* is also the expression I : U --> U* expressing the following:

    U --> U* is equivalent to {1} --> [1,1,1,1,1....]
    {1} is a singleton set -- static, finite and uni-constant
    [1,1,1,1,1...] is a multiset -- dynamic, infinite and multi-constant

    Intelligent Unity produces Intelligent Energy or Motion

    From the Intelligent Unity of [1,1,1,1,1...] emerges the infinite units of motion in a RS universe which allows for space/time and time/space to have being. This is where the metamathematical Cardinal Octave realizes and manifests Intelligent Unity to produce the Physical and Transphysical Universe in our Fixed Octave.

    The previous Cardinal Octave and our Fixed Octave

    The metamathematical Cardinal Octave is guided by Logos and Mythos and has the following evolution where the initial Topos Realm subsumes and interacts with all the other realms:

    1. Topos Theory Realm of an infinite variety of local topos theories or topoi
    2. Set Theory Realm of an infinite variety of local set theories
    3. Topological Nonmetric Realm of an infinite variety of nonmetric topologies
    4. Topological Metric Realm of an infinite variety of metric topologies
    5. Topological Metric Realm of a metric defining a particular space/time and time/space such as our Universe where the following occurs:
    a. Differentiation and Integration
    b. Various metric number forms and operations
    c. Various metric processes ie fractal recursion, geometric proportion
    d. Various metric stochastic and probabilistic processes

    Metric implies distance and dimensional measure to allow for an infinite variety of geometries.

    Item #5 above is where the 8th density of the Cardinal Octave intersects with the 1st density of the Fixed Octave. The Fixed Octave is the octave of relatively fixed and stable physical and transphysical laws to allow for evolution through the density stages. 

    The Topos in the Cardinal Octave is analogous to the body nature and provides the material and setting for general, proto-evolutionary Lila interplay which is playfully random and experimental. It seeks the Fixed Octave and so does a form of research and development.

    The Topos in our Fixed Octave remains analogous to the body nature and provides the material and setting for purposeful Lovela interplay and evolution within our Universe.              

    The RS2 astrophysics and cosmology allows for a variety of universes based on the variety of physical and mathematical parameters assigned to the units of motion or space-time. Its a wide open field of research and discourse with much to develop.

    There is, though, one key example of parametrization of a system and that is the density and sub-density levels that create somewhat intersecting and inter-active planes or universes. Density levels are determined by scales of dilation as well as other factors ie fractal recursion.

    The Ra group and Confederation sources give a general description of the physical Universe as boundless and infinite, with infinite stars and galaxies. 

    The cosmology model presented by Alex Vilenkin supports this notion. It also adds details that can be modified by the RS2 and IUP to fit a more complete cosmological topos model.

    See Many Worlds in One by Alex Vilenkin on youtube 

    Terms to modify are:

    1. Rapid inflation as rapid emergence
    2. Eternal inflation as eternal emergence
    3. False vacuum with high energy density as a dense nonmetric topological set of points of becoming
    4. False vacuum as negative pressure and reverse gravity defining the expansion process whereby potential nonmetric manifests as actualized metric through metrization.
    5. False vacuum decays into units of motion as metric topological points of being that assume dimensional properties and assumes the nature of a lower energy physical space-time vacuum called "true vacuum" that expands with the natural reference system per RS2 
    6. Multiple spherical bubble universes that emerge from the field of false vacuum can be defined in terms of the Cardinal Octave of infinite potential universes that the Creator explores to know Itself.

    There's more R&D needed of the IUP, RS2 and Vilenkin's model and further posts will need to cover this and the metaphysical cosmology.

    Print this item

      Misuse/Misapplication of the Law of One?
    Posted by: Plenum - 12-20-2015, 09:23 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (7)

    Crowley represents an interesting case study in the Ra Material.  If we take it on faith that what is being described has some fidelity to the deeper truth, then there are a few things to observe regards this individual.

    First of all, Crowley is a notorious figure in occult circles.  He is commonly regarded as being black, evil, perverted, and 'wicked'.

    And yet, despite his public reputation, Ra identifies him as positive.

    [Image: rnYsFlQ.jpg]

    Here is Don's very pertinent and incisive question:

    18.11 Questioner: Did this entity, then, even though he intellectually understood the Law of One, misuse it and therefore have to go through this healing process?

    Then the answer offers many interesting points to consider (at least interesting to me).

    Here's the link to the full reply: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=18#11

    I'll break down the answer into sections:

    Crowley became overstimulated with the true nature of things (obsessed?)

    Quote:Ra: I am Ra. This entity became, may we use the vibration sound complex, overstimulated with the true nature of things. This over-stimulation resulted in behavior that was beyond the conscious control of the entity.

    He understood the Balancing Process, and tried to apply it.  And yet, it seems that it led to a separation from other selves, rather than an integration (the true goal of balancing).  It seems the undue emphasis on the Balancing was the issue, not the balancing itself.

    Quote:The entity thus, in many attempts to go through the process of balancing, as we have described the various energy centers beginning with the red ray and moving upwards, became somewhat overly impressed or caught up in this process and became alienated from other-selves.

    He was positive (according to Ra).  Hard to accept for the gentler folk that maybe have only heard the stories and rumors.

    Quote:This entity was positive.


    And finally, Crowley's main issue was that he couldn't share (in a useful way) with other-selves.  The actual issue seems to be that the actual step before sharing - the comprehension of self - was not constructed in a manner which integrated the self (blue-ray comprehension).  Before something can be communicated, it has to be articulated and framed and phrased in a way that the self itself understands.

    This led to much spiritual pain.

    Quote:However, its journey was difficult due to the inability to use, synthesize, and harmonize the understandings of the desires of self so that it might have shared, in full compassion, with other-selves. This entity thus became very unhealthy, as you may call it, in a spiritual complex manner, and it is necessary for those with this type of distortion towards inner pain to be nurtured in the inner planes until such an entity is capable of viewing the experiences again with the lack of distortion towards pain.

    / /

    I think as seekers, we should keep Don's opening question in mind.  Is our understanding too intellectual, and not sufficiently integrated into our physical practice.  Do we end up understanding ourselves better as a result of this seeking, which then helps us to understand others better.  

    How much pain do we have?  How much alienation do we suffer from?  

    Are we truly becoming more integrated in other words.

    Print this item

      The political correctness of Ra and the Confederation
    Posted by: darklight - 12-10-2015, 08:00 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (59)

    Sometimes it´s hard to understand Ra´s statement about the opposite polarity. Ra stated more than once that one is no better than the other. If a 4th density neggie will plunder If he/she get the chance, than it seems that Ra states this negative action as completely normal. No respect to free will would be disobedience for both polarities.

    I´m sure Ra choose his words very carefully because of the ´prime directive´. There are a lot of things he can´t tell us.

    Print this item

      What is Ra's LOO?
    Posted by: 4Dsunrise - 12-08-2015, 03:23 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (38)

    This topic is towards understanding Ra's LOO, besides it being a call to a progressive social and educational movement. So this is properly LOO whereby "each post should be contemplated and crafted carefully and intentionally. Posts may contain a wide variety of differing perspectives informed by unique experiences, so long as each perspective contributes something meaningful and relevant to the discussion." 

    What is Ra's LOO?

    Picture this for yourself.

    While sitting in a cafe there are three college students who walk by your table and notice your book with the cover showing Ra and the Law of One.

    They say to you "Hey there! We couldn't help but notice. We are philosophy graduate students who are seriously thinking of doing dissertations related to esoteric and new age philosophy and are intrigued by your book."

    You say, "Oh yeah, it's definitely intriguing."

    They then ask, "Well, we would very much like to know, what is Ra's LOO?"

    You ask them, "Okay, do you have a couple hours to hang out here?"

    They say, "We have the whole afternoon free. We'll buy the coffee and sandwiches if you'll take the time to tell us what Ra's LOO is."

    You say, "Sounds good to me. I'll take a large Moca Joe and a tuna on rye. Let's get comfortable."
    --------------------------------------------------
    Okay Forum Moderators and other LOO veterans -- here's your opportunity to be LOO teachers and describe and explain what Ra's LOO is to a few bright and sincerely interested young people.

    How do you start describing Ra's LOO to them? 

    Ra's LOO is....

    A philosophy? A religion? A philosophy about what? What does Ra's LOO mean?
    What are its principles and implications? Is there a God? What kind of God? How is Ra's LOO different from other esoteric and new age philosophies? 

    Do you have these young people's attention and are you on your 2nd coffee?
    ----------------------------------------------------
    Seriously, LOO veterans please share in a post here answering the question, "What is your interpretation of Ra's LOO in terms of how you would describe it to a bright, open-minded person? What's your introductory description?"

    Think of this as a requirement to become a qualified LOO teacher -- like it is done with high school teachers.

    This OP is not meant to annoy but to stimulate a new movement towards becoming better students and teachers of Ra's LOO. Maybe you can start coffee house group discussions with the public in your town or city. Make a banner or sign to catch people's attention. Think of yourself as an activist in a social and educational campaign.

    But first share your approach to describing Ra's LOO for all the other 5800+ registered folk and potential teachers here to read and take ideas from. This should then provide a foundation of introductory knowledge to take with you to the cafe.

    Of course, feel free to offer other ideas on how to stimulate this "cafe campaign".

    Print this item

      An Apology to The Original Thought
    Posted by: The_Tired_Philosopher - 12-02-2015, 09:33 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (48)

    Apology as in Explanation:

    1.0 "Let us for a moment consider thought.
    What is it, my friends, to take thought?
    Took you then thought today?
    What thoughts did you think today?
    What thoughts were part of the original thought today?
    In how many of your thoughts did the creation abide?
    Was love contained?
    And was service freely given?
    You are not part of a material universe.
    You are part of a thought.
    You are dancing in a ballroom in which there is no material.
    You are dancing thoughts.
    You move your body, your mind, and your spirit in somewhat eccentric patterns for you have not completely grasped the concept that you are part of the original thought."

    What is the Original Thought?

    Quote:82.10 Questioner: Why does this partaking in the original thought have a gradient radially outward? That’s the way I understand your statement.
    "I am Ra.
    This is the plan of the One Infinite Creator.
    The One Original Thought is the harvest of all previous, if you would use this term, experience of the Creator by the Creator.
    As It decides to know Itself It generates Itself into that plenum, full of the glory and the power of the One Infinite Creator which is manifested to your perceptions as space or outer space.
    Each generation of this knowing begets a knowing which has the capacity, through free will, to choose methods of knowing Itself.
    Therefore, gradually, step by step, the Creator becomes that which may know Itself, and the portions of the Creator partake less purely in the power of the original word or thought.
    This is for the purpose of refinement of the one original thought.
    The Creator does not properly create as much as It experiences Itself."

    ...Sooooo the Original Thought is the Infinite Soul-Stream of the One Infinite Creator directing itself?  So then when Ra says the Infinite Creator is Re-experiencing itself, they don't mean like a 'repeat' button, but instead that it literally designs and creates then explores itself after giving every facet of itself the free will to be as it will be, the Creator does not self-interfere so much as guide in areas where it is deemed needed?  So then how does it Re-experience and perform this all?

    (Which requires getting into Logos differentiating the underlying patterned constructions of intelligent infinity or the 'uniquification' of the laws of reality both meta/physically.  Which occurs to create the playground for the Creator to generate itself in various mannerisms and ways to infinitely continue experiencing.  So to just fast-forward through all of that since the semantics break down considerably with extended distortion of terms in proper subtle contexts...  Logos=...varies? black hole? [correct me if I'm wrong], Sub Logos=sun, Sub-Sub Logos=mind/body/spirit complex.)

    Quote:54.8 Questioner: OK. Once a mind/body/spirit complex becomes aware of this process it then decides that in order to have the abilities, the full abilities of the Creation and the Creator of which it is a small part yet at the same time, all of, in order to have the abilities that go with the entire Creation, it is necessary to reunite its thinking or reharmonize its thinking with the Original Creative Thought in precise vibration or frequency of vibration I will say. In order to do this it is necessary to discipline the personality so that it precisely conforms to the Original Thought or Original Vibration, and this is broken into seven areas of discipline each corresponding to one of the colors of the spectrum. Is this correct?
    "I am Ra.
    This statement, though correct, bears great potential for being misunderstood.
    The precision with which each energy center matches the Original Thought lies not in the systematic placement of each energy nexus but rather in the fluid and plastic placement of the balanced blending of these energy centers in such a way that intelligent energy is able to channel itself with minimal distortion.

    The mind/body/spirit complex is not a machine. It is rather what you might call a tone poem."

    So it Re-experiences itself by becoming a distortion of itself, with a bias to seek it's purity, with various paths of distorted purity gradually blending upwards into various more pure or less distorted gradients of itself.  Essentially, re-experiencing the grand eternal infinite permanent changing being of itself, since it isn't 'repeating' so much as 'exploring' via re-experiencing.  Like a Video Game Creator designing its level, but giving the level it's own will to also design itself, then exploring that with some knowledge but not all.  Which in this veil state is like upping the ante, you come into it knowing nothing but if you can remember and retain being through the heavy distortions it shines like an intensified sparkle in terms of experience, it's the true re-meeting of self in blindness to self in chances of near-hopelessness poignantly, maybe out of necessity, or maybe just by chance, to be looked at later on in a place of review to come to fully appreciate the experience after-the-fact, or even at a place of review before changing physical form (death).  So the real question is whats the purpose of the Original Thought?

    Quote:71.12 Questioner: Then it seems to me from this that the sub-Logos such as our sun uses free will to modify only slightly a much more general idea of created evolution so that the general plan of created evolution, which seems then to be uniform throughout the One Infinite Creation, is for this process of the sub-Logoi to grow through the densities and, under the first distortion, find their way back to the original thought. Is this correct?
    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

    (My Note to You: Remember that Ra says the Logos does not experience the same distortions of progression through Densities as us Sub-Sub Logoi do, including our Sun, a Sub-Logoi, so in this quote where Ra answers yes to Don's 'sub-logoi' question, I take it that the subject context is in regards to all Sub-Logoi including Sub-Sub Logoi and not just Stars and Black Holes.)

    So the Original Thought is Unconditional Love Meeting itself infinitely through itself, with Unconditional Love really just meaning One Infinite Creator.  Even though I couldn't find the Quote that says the Original Thought is most closely related to our concept of Unconditional Love...  I swear it's somewhere...  If we all go on that premise, then it's fair game to say we are Love, learning to be ourselves towards each other, with Love imbued, whether in positive or negative polarity (though negative polarity might not call it 'love', everything is 'love' when you care about it in some way to be attached or detached.) thus...

    The Purpose of Existence, is to Be Your God Damn Self.

    You are Designed to naturally progress when you just Be Your God Damn Self.  Polarity wise, if you just Be Your God Damn Self you will come to your desired output regardless, unless you assign unrealistic goals, which some of us do as our normal God Damn Selves.  The Ego is also us, and is not something to transcend or overcome.

    It falls away when you perform this simple act towards it.

    Accept and Love, Cherish it, do not silence it, do not hold it in the dark when your light of consciousness comes around.  Put it upon the same pedestal you would a beautiful rose.  The skeletons in your heart are just as beautiful as the skeletons all around you.  To judge yourself is to perpetuate such pain.  You are here to learn Love, and Love comes in All Ways, so everything you're learning is Love.

    I'm tired of seeing us quibble and squabble over semantics, differentiating context between individual/collective in various areas but not all areas.  I do it a lot, and I see others do who don't seem to realize it, or maybe you do like I do and just don't know how to fully explain how something is both individual and collective, while still appearing only individualized, without collectivity when that's literally by design impossible, except where made possible for intents of experiencing fulfilling the 'there is no impossible' aspect, except where such a design is desired.  Thus such as in 3D where we are very limited.  Impossible is an aspect, not an absolute.  It falls in line with Improbable, Implausible.  It is not typical except when desired to be, and in 3D that is a desire, the need to be limited to push self, to learn more intensely, stringently maybe, or more openly, freely,with a myriad web of varieties of experiences populating each life until it's one long memory of artwork rather than scruff and gruff, unless that's part of what made it artfully creative and beautiful.

    Because your Personality is in of itself a Creative Design, you are inherently Creative.  So when we speak of any thing, perhaps it helps to know that everything is one thing, and so perfectly made to look separated that it is logically impossible to have ever truly been except in appearance, a perfection of Creatively Creating Reality to be as it was desired to be in this place, appearing separate to be learned to overcome.

    A Hydrogen Atom contains the whole Cosmos, it is thus by design, One Infinite Creation/Creator.  From the smallest to the largest.

    All is One, at the exact same time, simultaneity.

    Which begins the endless process of additions, and which being in itself also a design, allows one to further creatively refine itself while being itself.  Literally like a video game character who can change aspects of itself from look to stats by simply the same way we might move our arm or smile if we did so from Point B towards our-tangible self on Point A, except Point B is 'in the future' and Point A is 'in the present' (both are the same 'time'; 'present/future/past')  so yourself on Point B points yourself on Point A creatively to help guide the design without interfering with it's actual decision making.

    Polarity stuff makes NO SENSE to me after a point, it all falls apart into logical incoherency of contradictions and semantics.

    Unity stuff makes complete sense to me.

    Isn't it incredible...
    I might live in Hell, but at least I know Hell is Heaven, there is no differentiation, everything is everything, it's just what you focus on to make which parts stand out, and the rest 'hidden in plain sight' behind the focus, no different than being a camera trying to capture something clearly but focusing on the wrong areas making my actual desired subject-focus blurry.

    -yawns and pulls up controller-
    Anyways, just wanted to tell y'all that we're kurrayyzzy and so we should stop being so bothered by everything and realize everything is kurrayyzzy and thus nothing cannot not, NOT make sense!

    -puts on headset-
    Off to the Battlefield for me, using my knowledge of unity to dominate superficially virtually and make life easier for everyone around me.

    Like my coworkers and mother, and friends.

    And my self.

    -electrically fades away into static-

    Print this item

      6D - 7D Mysteries
    Posted by: Verum Occultum - 11-30-2015, 06:09 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (43)

    "81.16 Questioner: Ra states that it has knowledge of only this octave, but it seems that Ra has complete knowledge of this octave.

    Can you tell me why this is?

    Ra: I am Ra. Firstly, we do not have complete knowledge of this octave. There are portions of the seventh density which, although described to us by our teachers, remain mysterious. Secondly, we have experienced a great deal of the available refining catalyst of this octave, and our teachers have worked with us most carefully that we may be one with all, that in turn our eventual returning to the great allness of creation shall be complete."

    "16.26 Questioner: Well, roughly how many total planets in this galaxy of stars that we’re in have aware life regardless of density?

    Ra: I am Ra. Approximately six seven, oh oh oh, oh oh oh [67,000,000].

    16.27 Questioner: Can you tell me what percentage of those are third, fourth, fifth, sixth density, etc.? Roughly, very roughly.

    Ra: I am Ra. A percentage seventeen for first density, a percentage twenty for second density, a percentage twenty-seven for third density, a percentage sixteen for fourth density, a percentage six for fifth density. The other information must be withheld. The free will of your future is not making this available. We shall speak on one item. There is a fairly large percentage, approximately thirty-five percent of the intelligent planets, which do not fit in the percentiles. These mysteries are of sixth and seventh density and are not available for our speaking."

    I was thinking that in 7D you live in an 'abstraction' of your own creation, that you are not a part of space or time, and you can appear in any time and space you want (in the illusion). You are omnipresent and omniscient (of this octave), and you basically create your own civilizations. Or does one unify with its own Sub-Logos in 7D?

    Print this item

    Pages (165): « Previous 1 … 57 58 59 60 61 … 165 Next »
     

    Forum Statistics
    » Members: 12,007
    » Latest member: Phantomy
    » Forum threads: 15,903
    » Forum posts: 300,175

    Full Statistics

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media