Quote:A WANDERER’S HANDBOOK GLOSSARY

Service to others: the path of radiation and openhearted giving. The positive polarity where the seeker attempts to see and serve the Creator in all. The intention to serve others in at least 51% of one’s efforts will qualify the seeker for graduation into fourth density light. The path of that which is: unity.

Service to self: the path of magnetism and control. The negative polarity where the seeker attempts to cause others to serve the Creator in the self. The intention to control others to serve the self must be present in at least 95% of the seeker’s efforts for graduation into the fourth density in the negative sense. The path of that which is not: separation.

let us reverse creation:


human beings are sub-sub-logoi

the sun is a sub-logos

the center of the Milky Way (our galaxy) is the logos



is the LOGOS the original principle?

- -

would we die if we travelled to another Logos (galaxy) because the parameters there are configured differently? (the spiritual equivalent of a human being trying to breathe nitrogen)

is the logos our grandfather?

Ra Wrote:17.38 Questioner: Are there seven sub-planes to what we call our physical plane here?

Ra: I am Ra. You are correct. This is difficult to understand. There are an infinite number of planes. In your particular space/time continuum distortion there are seven sub-planes of mind/body/spirit complexes. You will discover the vibrational nature of these seven planes as you pass through your experiential distortions, meeting other-selves of the various levels which correspond to the energy influx centers of the physical vehicle.

this following answers given by Ra to a question regards the energy centers highlight the nature of our spiritual journey.

it is this: that all the experiences and feelings we have are just teach/learnings that we have set up for ourself.

here comes the question from Don about the energy centers, which are activated, which are not:

Quote:42.10 Questioner: How can an individual assess what energy centers within its being are activated and in no immediate need of attention and which energy centers are not activated and are in need of immediate attention?

Quote:Ra: I am Ra. The thoughts of an entity, its feelings or emotions, and least of all its behavior are the signposts for the teaching/learning of self by self.

Quote: In the analysis of one’s experiences of a diurnal cycle an entity may assess what it considers to be inappropriate thoughts, behaviors, feelings, and emotions.

Quote:In examining these inappropriate activities of mind, body, and spirit complexes the entity may then place these distortions in the proper vibrational ray and thus see where work is needed.

Quote:42.9 Questioner: How can a person know when he is unswayed by an emotionally charged situation or if he is repressing the flow of emotions, or if he is in balance and truly unswayed?

Ra: I am Ra. We have spoken to this point. Therefore, we shall briefly iterate that to the balanced entity no situation has an emotional charge but is simply a situation like any other in which the entity may or may not observe an opportunity to be of service. The closer an entity comes to this attitude the closer an entity is to balance. You may note that it is not our recommendation that reactions to catalyst be repressed or suppressed unless such reactions would be a stumbling block not consonant with the Law of One to an other-self. It is far, far better to allow the experience to express itself in order that the entity may then make fuller use of this catalyst.

Well, it has been interesting and revealing.

As with religion anywhere it is always corrupted to some degree by the opinions of those who try to profess it to meet their own agandas.

In looking back over past threads I can see that this community has long been fighting that same old battle with visitors that come here and see the contradictions, try to point them out and then get gangbanged by the same little gang. They know who they are. It would be a grand waste of time to cut and paste threads to point to anyone in particular because they are what they are and certainly revealed themselves clearly to me. Pretense is meaningless. True love for others is not something that once can hide. And petty selfishness also reveals itself in the way that one responds to another.

I wanted to light a fire here under the issue of STs and that has been done. I was not aware that this same thing has been a contention before and is a recurring theme. That should tell you something, but instead you will continue to ignore it. Enjoy the darkness and exploring the STS path and convince yourselves that it is just another means of understanding your true identity. You will learn the truth the hard way. Your self deception and delusion will reveal itself to you as you evolve. I have let my light shine here on the matter and will not bring it up again. I made the effort and now know who is who. Those who responded to me coyly and disrespectfully know who they are. And that is just who they are. They do not need me to tell them.

This is my take on the Law of One as professed by L/L Research and it will probably be cut or sent into oblivion.

But for what it is worth, even if it touched one person who truly seeks the Light, I will be happy.

The original groups back in 1958 attracted Don Elkins attention. the channleing which they did found in the Brown Notebook reveals two entities knwon as Hatonn and Latwii who speak of love for others as the only way to follow the Creator to the Light. Their words are filled with hope and love and light. They denounce service to self as both unnecessary and not a path to be taken by anyone for any reason unless one would want to be selfish and self centered and not give a care for anyone other than themselves.

They also made it clear that there is darkness in the world and that as intelligent beings we would be wise to beware of it. It is in control of this planet and applies mass manipulation to enslave mankind with deception and greed.

Now along comes Don Elkins and he reads this material and decides to try channeling as well. Only he and Carla seem to have connected with this entity named Ra who is in disagreement with Hatonn and Latwii. Ra espouses that if all is one than there is really no difference between STS and STO and that it is really nothing more than personal preference. Ra suggets that if one wants to explore STS, that eventually it will still get one to the Creator. There is no warning. There is no continuation of what was channeled through Hatonn and Latwii. Ra shows no concern for the darkness or greed and selfishness. And they use the Law of One to support their teachings.

Now, in 2011 someone from L/L Research comes across these Brown Notebooks and chooses to post a link to it on the forum. BUT Carla decides to disassociate herself from them not wishing to acknowledge their teachings as valuable or unworthy.

This seems strange and it would be interesting to know exactly who came across that material and why she chose to disregard it, while at the same time adding it to the L/L Research information base.

I will not make accusations, just assumptions based on what seems to be revealing itself to me.

Carla and Don probably meant well. In that era peace and love and very liberal attitudes were running rampant. not to mention that everyone was fried out of their minds. I think they channelled in opposition to the teachings of Hatonn and Latwii and came up with Ra. In this way their ideals around self and free will not quite as discolored as they were by Hatonn.

Decades later someone in L/L Research comes across the brown Notebook and Carla must reconfront the issue. She okays a link to it but declares that she cannot either support it nor deny it. she simply flat out disassociates herself from a group the group, the Circle R, that was soley responsible for the adventure that she then spent the rest of her life on. With her Bible never out of reach she finds her comfort in removing herself from Don's roots in the Circle R channleings, and professing the teachings of Ra, in contradiction to the teaching of Hatonn.

Which of these entities should be heard? Who was channeling truth, the Circle R or L/L Research?

From what I observe, if you are one who likes to explore selfishness and greed and yet want to have a cleqar consciousness about it and be able to use entity quotations to support your self centered attitiude, than following the teaching of Ra would be the way to go. there is clearly much confusion and vagueness to cover your tracks there.

Whereas if you want to explore STS and darkness, you defintiely do not want to follow the teachings of Hatonn and Latwii. They will reveal your true colors in a millisecond.

It is a shame that in a community that is so enlightened about so many aspects of the One Consciousness and the nature of poalrity and duality, that there are still some who just cannot let go of the flesh. That addiction is a very difficult barrier to conquer. the Ancient Ones have taught about that addiction for thousands of years, and follow8ing the teaching of Ra, or Don Elkins, is not going to eliminate eons of Ancient teaching.

In the words of Hatonn and Latwii,

"People must seek this love and light, for there is great darkness in the world. It will bring about a better world and greater understanding.The basis of a true understanding of the Creator has been given: love and light. Some choose to follow this path. Others stumble along their own path of darkness."

Many will attenpt to derail and debunk this observation as they have done here in the past. But the Light when shone on the darkness here will continue to return through various Lightbringers.

they will always be spat on and ridiculed because the darkness hates the Light. And propnents of STS will always try to paint the Lightbringers in a shade that serves themselves. Isn't that what STS really is?

I've been talking with another fairly intelligent person. He's curious about my beliefs. Much of my understanding comes from the LOO. I mentioned this below to him. Am I pretty close? You think I'm describing it good?

----
My belief is that everything we see and touch is in essence God. Though God is infinite, so obviously not limited to time and space. Much of the potential of God, or Logos as I call it (the principle of Love that is in essence God), is unmanifest.

If I recall correctly, infinity became aware in order that Creator would be able to experience itself. There wasn't a "when" this happened, since all time is an illusion and is simultaneous. i.e. there is only the everpresent NOW.

As everything is one, each one of us is in essence Creator experiencing itself. Otherselves are simply a mirror into our own self. The fact we see others as separate from ourselves is an illusion. In fact, we are them and they are us. Really, the only thing that there is, is Creator. What we feel being separate, it is illusion. Creator is all there is.

I'm not sure how infinity became aware. The Law of One was a little vague on that. I'm no expert on this by any means. It's just the philosophy I've found that cleared up most of my questions.

According to what I've learned, there are various levels of Logoi. Our galaxy is a Logos, and is conscious. Our sun is another conscious Logos. So is our planet. And we as individiuals are Logoi. Our thoughts are creating on levels within us. So everything creates. We are in a sense god to the universe within us. Even minerals, plants, animals, have a consciousness to them. It might not always be self-aware, but it's still consciousness.

There are also layers, or densities of reality, as the Law of One refers to them. In higher densities, there is less distortion. Thoughts create more immediately in higher densities. We as humans are currently in third density.

That quote you mentioned simply says that free will is the first distortion from the One Original Thought. The second distortion from the One Original Thought is Love, and third distortion is Light. Light is what makes up all matter.

Basically, it's like:
Infinity -> Intelligent Infinity -> Intelligent Energy -> Matter

Hope that clears some up. You're really making me think here.

I think that's so fantastic that we each could be Creator experiencing itself.

Everything we experience such as emotions, IS Creator. Creator is all there is.

Regarding multiverses, sure. Every thought we have is another universe. Every possible decision we can make splits out into infinite possibilities. And all of them are equally valid and real in their own universe. Every new instant we're in another universe.

The White Magician heals the Earth.



definition

(49.8) This is the reason for the existence of the so-called White Magician. Only those wishing to pursue the conscious raising of planetary vibration will find visualization to be a particularly satisfying type of meditation.

how to do it

(50.8) The adept will not simply be tapping into intelligent energy as a means of readiness for harvest but tapping into both intelligent energy and intelligent infinity for the purpose of transmuting planetary harvestability and consciousness.

symbols and Light

(67.13) The magical principles, shall we say, may be loosely translated into your system of magic whereby symbols are used and traced and visualized in order to develop the power of the light.

what happens

there is a quote that says that when you put yourself in this meditative state and concentrate on a symbol, you signal to the 'other side' that you are ready to be a conduit of green ray energies into this density. These energies then flow in and through you, and are 'alive'.

- -

I've been working with a crystal and really enjoying this type of service.

Don asks a question about the unmanifested Self (the self when alone), and Ra decides to give a Lesson in PAIN.

- -
here is the Question:

Quote:34.6 Questioner: Thank you. Can you give me examples of catalytic action from the last session beginning with the self unmanifested producing learning catalyst?

Quote:Ra: I am Ra. We observed your interest in the catalyst of pain. This experience is most common among your entities. The pain may be of the physical complex. More often it is of the mental and emotional complex. In some few cases the pain is spiritual in complex-nature.

Quote:The lessons to be learned vary. Almost always these lessons include patience, tolerance, and the ability for the light touch.

Quote:Very often the catalyst for emotional pain, whether it be the death of the physical complex of one other-self which is loved or other seeming loss, will simply result in the opposite, in a bitterness and impatience, a souring. This is catalyst which has gone awry. In these cases then there will be additional catalyst provided to offer the unmanifested self further opportunities for discovering the self as all-sufficient Creator containing all that there is and full of joy.

Quote:Creation is a single entity or unity. If only a single entity exists, then the only concept of service is the concept of service to self. If this single entity subdivides, then the concept of service of one of its parts to one of its other parts is born. From this springs the equality of service to self or to others. It would seem that as the Logos subdivided, parts would select each orientation. As individualized entities emerge in space/time then I would assume that they have polarity. Is this statement correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This statement is quite perceptive and correct until the final phrase in which we note that the polarities begin to be explored only at the point when a third density entity becomes aware of the possibility of choice between the concept or distortion of service to self or service to others. This marks the end of what you may call the unself-conscious or innocent phase of conscious awareness.

Quote:Questioner: Then what you are saying is that once the path is recognized, either the positive or the negative polarized entity can find hints along his path as to the efficiency of that path. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. That which you say is correct upon its own merits, but is not a repetition of our statement. Our suggestion was that within the experiential nexus of each entity within its second-density environment and within the roots of mind there were placed biases indicating to the watchful eye the more efficient of the two paths. Let us say, for want of a more precise adjective, that this Logos has a bias towards kindness.

Quote:Questioner: You stated previously that The Choice is made in this third-density and is the axis upon which the creation turns. Could you expand on your reason for making that statement?

Ra: I am Ra. This is a statement of the nature of creation as we speak to you.

Quote:Questioner: Can you tell me how intelligent infinity became, shall we say (I’m having difficulty with the language), how intelligent infinity became individualized from itself?

Ra: I am Ra. This is an appropriate question.

The intelligent infinity discerned a concept. This concept was discerned to be freedom of will of awareness. This concept was finity. This was the first and primal paradox or distortion of the Law of One. Thus the one intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness. Due to the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity there is no ending to many-ness. The exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal present.

---

The original desire is that entities seek and become one. If entities can do this in a moment, they may go forward in a moment, and, thus, were this to occur in a major cycle, indeed, the third-density planet would be vacated at the end of that cycle.

It is, however, more towards the median or mean, shall we say, of third-density developments throughout the one infinite universe that there be a small harvest after the first cycle; the remainder having significantly polarized, the second cycle having a much larger harvest; the remainder being even more significantly polarized, the third cycle culminating the process and the harvest being completed.

Questioner: Third density, then, compared to the rest of the densities, all of them, is nothing but a uniquely short period of what we consider to be time and is for the purpose of this choice.

Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is precisely correct. The prelude to choice must encompass the laying of the foundation, the establishment of the illusion and the viability of that which can be made spiritually viable. The remainder of the densities is continuous refining of the choice. This also is greatly lengthened, as you would use the term. The choice is, as you put it, the work of a moment but is the axis upon which the creation turns.[/b]

---

Ra: I am Ra. Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.

Quote:Questioner: I would like then to trace the evolution of catalyst upon the mind/body/spirit complexes and how it comes into use and is fully used to create this tuning. I assume that the sub-Logos that formed our tiny part of the creation using the intelligence of the Logos of which it is a part, provides the base catalyst that will act upon mind/body complexes and mind/body/spirit complexes before they have reached a state of development where they can begin to program their own catalyst. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is partially correct. The sub-Logos offers the catalyst at the lower levels of energy, the first triad; these have to do with the survival of the physical complex. The higher centers gain catalyst from the biases of the mind/body/spirit complex itself in response to all random and directed experiences.

Thus the less developed entity will perceive the catalyst about it in terms of survival of the physical complex with the distortions which are preferred. The more conscious entity being conscious of the catalytic process will begin to transform the catalyst offered by the sub-Logos into catalyst which may act upon the higher energy nexi. Thus the sub-Logos can offer only a basic skeleton, shall we say, of catalyst. The muscles and flesh having to do with the, shall we say, survival of wisdom, love, compassion, and service are brought about by the action of the mind/body/spirit complex on basic catalyst so as to create a more complex catalyst which may in turn be used to form distortions within these higher energy centers.

The more advanced the entity, the more tenuous the connection between the sub-Logos and the perceived catalyst until, finally, all catalyst is chosen, generated, and manufactured by the self, for the self.

unity100 decides to knock it out of the ballpark in this particular thread:

http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=1593

- -

in the following quotes, he speaks to the experience of a ROCK!

he we goes:

(09-20-2010, 04:24 PM)unity100 Wrote: i think it would be more precise to consider it a 'rock spirit' beingness, a state of being, that exists within that rock. general rock spirit state would differ from rock to rock, with infinite variations and nature, within themselves.

and more importantly;

did you stop to think that whether that rock wanted to be moved from its location or not, or to be shattered ?

(09-21-2010, 09:12 AM)unity100 Wrote: or, you would feel very annoyed, since you have been burned and frozen and grinded for aeons going about around the planet and in its crust and finally were enjoying a brief interlude of peace without change.

what you would consider an 'opportunity' may not be as such for the other.

(09-21-2010, 12:47 PM)unity100 Wrote: annoying or being pleased is translation of the situation to our understanding frame.

the preferences of rocks, their experiences would include 'change', 'being changed', and motion.

(09-21-2010, 02:08 PM)unity100 Wrote: it should not be taken as just a simple concept like 'happiness'. it should be understood more in the violet ray equivalent of being comfortable with its density/surroundings and the rate of change.
or, violet ray's equivalent for earlier octave. ie, balance and its situation in regard to the other balances in the environment.