The more I read the Law of One the more I find myself questioning whether or not I'm remaining objective in my thinking. To address this I usually go back and review this idea, as it blipped in to my head a few months ago, to remind myself just how well it maps with the notions discussed in the LOO.

In my darker moments I've told myself, "This could all be coincidence, after all, these concepts are the purview of almost all philosophical doctrines." But then as I dig deeper I call to mind that not only are the philosophical elements the same even the numerical values correlate.

For instance in the below diagram, before I knew anything about the Law of One, I had come to the conclusion that we were in Q3 on the cusp of Q4. Upon publishing the idea online an anonymous person pointed me in the direction of David Wilcock's which inadvertently lead me to the Law of One.

Let me tell you when Ra first mentions that humans are segueing from 3rd density to 4th I did one hell of a double take!



As I read further I couldn't help but boggle at the similarity between the two ideas. The notion of intelligent infinity fits with the concept of value, to be produced & reproduced, going to infinity as described in book 1, pg. 102,

Quote:... Their purposes are very simple: to allow those entities of your planet to become aware of infinity which is often best expressed to the uninformed as the mysterious or unknown.

Quote:... fourth, the cycle of love or understanding; ...

Quote:This sphere is at this time in fourth-dimension vibration. Its material is quite confused due to the society memory complexes embedded in its consciousness

Quote:I am Ra. The sphere upon which you dwell is third density in its beingness of mind/body/spirit complexes. It is now in a space/time continuum, fourth density. This is causing a somewhat difficult harvest.

Quote:There is past, present, and future in third density. In an overview such as an entity may have, removed from the space/time continuum, it may be seen that in the cycle of completion there exists only the present. We, ourselves, seek to learn this understanding. At the seventh level or dimension, we shall, if our humble efforts are sufficient, become one with all, thus having no memory, no identity, no past or future, but existing in the all.

Quote:Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.

I was listening to a somewhat recent interview given by Carla, moderated by Norwegian journalist Anne Hess, where Mrs. Rueckert says, "If you listen to one of the CDs that have the Law of One audio on it, from our site, 'You. Can. Hear. Ra. Speaking. Like. This. With. No. Break. Between. Sentences. Or. Words. Or. Ideas. and ...' (interview @3:25)"

This made me curious enough that I started digging around on llresearch.org, lawofone.info, et cetera trying to find a link to listen to a sample or to purchase a copy of the audio sessions. However for the life of me I can't find anything that appears to be an authentic copy of the original recordings.

Can someone point me in the right direction?

Thanks!

Book I, Session 7

Questioner: I have a question about that Council. Who are the members,
and how does the Council function?
Ra: I am Ra. The members of the Council are representatives from the
Confederation and from those vibratory levels of your inner planes bearing
responsibility for your third density. The names are not important because
there are no names. Your mind/body/spirit complexes request names and
so, in many cases, the vibratory sound complexes which are consonant with the vibratory distortions of each entity are used. However, the name
concept is not part of the Council. If names are requested, we will attempt
them. However, not all have chosen names.


What Ra mean by "the vibratory sound complexes which are consonant with the vibratory distortions of each entity are used"?

Is this how we give things names? Is that why people with the same name tend to have certain common traits? In a TV show, a girl said "Wendy sounds like a fat girl's name", I wonder if she ever questioned why she feels this way. How do the scientists explain this phenomenon? How people associate objects with names?

Based on observations performed at mid-infrared wavelengths, with the powerful VLT spectrometer and imager for the mid-infrared (VISIR) instrument at the VLT, combined with additional data including: spectra acquired using VLT-FORS, optical and infrared images from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, and radio observations from the Australia Telescope National Facility, astronomers confirm that black holes create galaxies, as Ra explained of Logos in The Law of One (Ra Materials).

Quote:28.7 Questioner: Thank you. Does a unit of consciousness, an individualized unit of consciousness, create a unit of the creation? I will give an example.

One individualized consciousness creates one galaxy of stars, the type that has many millions of stars in it. Does this happen?

Ra: I am Ra. This can happen. The possibilities are infinite. Thus a Logos may create what you call a star system or it may be the Logos creating billions of star systems. This is the cause of the confusion in the term galaxy, for there are many different Logos entities or creations and we would call each, using your sound vibration complexes, a galaxy.

28.9 Questioner: Then what you are saying is that the lenticular star system which we call a galaxy that we find ourselves in with approximately 250 billion other suns like our own was created by a single Logos. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

When I was waking up this morning I was having a dream. The dream was basically about how a coincidence is linked to the source. (or something like that). As I began to wake up, I started meditating on this. When I was thinking about it, I was for a moment able to see how the parts of a "coincidence" are linked together through the collective consciousness, and that they were not coincidences at all, they were the resut of one thought connected, interwoven, with each other. I could understand the logic of it. When I became more lucid from the dream/meditative state I lost it, and could not remember what I had been thinking exactly.

I was hoping someone could comment on how the phenomenon of a coincidence as it relates to the Law of One. This has always most interested me as "coincedence" seems to be a key component of the "game play" and novelty in our illusion.
Thanks!

LoO, session 51, Book III

Questioner: Thank you. It seems to me, and you can tell me where I am
going wrong with this statement, that we have seven bodies each
corresponding to one of the seven colors of the spectrum and that energy
that creates these seven bodies is a universal type of energy that streams into
our planetary environment and comes in through the seven energy centers
that we have called chakras to develop and perfect these bodies. Each of
these bodies is somehow related to the mental configuration that we have
and the perfection of these bodies and the total in-streaming of this energy
is a function of this mental configuration, and through this mental
configuration we may block, to some extent, the in-streamings of energy
that created these seven bodies. Could you comment on where I am wrong
and correct that which I have stated?
Ra: I am Ra. Your statement is substantially correct. To use the term
“mental configuration” is to oversimplify the manners of blockage of instreaming
which occur in your density. The mind complex has a
relationship to the spirit and body complexes which is not fixed. Thus
blockages may occur betwixt spirit and mind, or body and mind, upon
many different levels. We reiterate that each energy center has seven subcolors,
let us say, for convenience. Thus spiritual/mental blockages
combined with mental/bodily blockages may affect each of the energy
centers in several differing ways. Thus you may see the subtle nature of the
balancing and evolutionary process.


1. Each of the seven rays creates each of the seven densities and we use different bodies to funtion in these densities, is this correct?

2. Are the seven rays radiated from the sun the same as the seven rays in the rainbow? I suppose not, since if they are we the seven densities created from these rays would be visible to us, is this correct?

3. By activating each of seven enegy centers, we perfect the corresponding bodies in the corresponding densities, rather than to activate them. These bodies can be only activated after we exit space/time in the corresponding density, is this correct?

Does anyone have an audio version of the Ra Material that they could upload? I'd like to listen to it while driving/working

Book II Session 34

Questioner: You stated at an earlier time that penetration of the eighth level
or intelligent infinity allows a mind/body/spirit complex to be harvested if it
wishes at any time/space during the cycle.

What is penetration of intelligent infinity like? Can anyone give me an example? Some people can bend spoon with their mind, does that mean they have penetrated intelligent infinity?

In reading session 75, I found this particular part interesting, in being that I am a wanderer and I have as much as lived this response. First is the entire Q&A

Quote:75.23 Questioner: I am sorry for my confusion. Sometimes, as you say, sound vibration complexes are not very adequate.

The answer to this next question probably has to do with our distorted view of time, but as I see it, Wanderers in this density who come from the fifth-density or sixth-density should already be of a relatively high degree of adeptness and they must follow a slightly different path back to the adeptness that they once had in a higher density and get as close to it as they can in the third-density. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. Your query is less than perfectly focused. We shall address the subject in general.

There are many Wanderers whom you may call adepts who do no conscious work in the present incarnation. It is a matter of attention. One may be a fine catcher of your game sphere, but if the eye is not turned as this sphere is tossed then perchance it will pass the entity by. If it turned its eyes upon the sphere, catching would be easy. In the case of Wanderers which seek to recapitulate the degree of adeptness which each had acquired previous to this life experience, we may note that even after the forgetting process has been penetrated there is still the yellow activated body which does not respond as does the adept which is of a green- or blue-ray activated body. Thusly, you may see the inevitability of frustrations and confusion due to the inherent difficulties of manipulating the finer forces of consciousness through the chemical apparatus of the yellow-ray activated body.

In Malcolm Gladwell's book 'Outliers,' he explores some people whose experiences are very different from what most people experience. In Gladwell's opinion, the average person can learn a lot by studying outliers.

Don Elkins's studies certainly revolved around 'outlying' experiences, at or beyond the fringes of most people's experiences and understandings of the universe they lived in.

Gladwell concludes that to be one of the most extraordinary experts in a field usually requires ten thousand hours or more of study. He gives a few examples.

Mozart began music studies very young, but did not create what is considered his first masterpiece until he'd probably had about ten thousand hours of study.

The Beatles had to play a relentless quantity of material at daily shows during their time in Hamburg. When they got their record deal, they had likely been on stage together more than ten thousand hours, and may well have had more work experience than any of their competitors at the time.

Bill Gates got to learn computer programming in high school, long before most kids got access to computers. By the time he dropped out of college to form Microsoft, he likely had ten thousand hours of programming experience, and far more than anyone else in his generation looking to start a company.

I haven't read the whole book yet, so I might miss something, but I think Gladwell doesn't discuss Steve Wozniak. But Woz probably also meets the criteria of ten thousand hours of electronic design experience before designing the Apple computer.

From reading Henry Ford's autobiography, I think that Ford also meets the ten thousand hour criterion with his own engine studies and management experience before his great success.

Now I turn to Secrets of the UFO by Don Elkins and Carla Reuckert. I had not read it until just recently, when I finally gave up my stubborn refusal to pay attention to Carla's suggestion that the Ra books will make more sense if one reads Secrets first. She's right and I wish I had taken them in that order, rather than the reverse.

Think a bit about would best qualify a person to research UFO's. Here is a reported phenomenon that involves aerial craft, esoteric thought, hypnosis, evidence that flees from skeptical debunkers, and discussion of advanced physics concepts.

Now comes the researcher, a pilot, engineering teacher, open-minded philosophical explorer, experienced hypnotist, utterly impartial collector of evidence steadfastly not evaluated yet, familiar with the relevant developments in theoretical physics, equipped to envision multi-dimension concepts and turn them over in his mind. No casting agent in Hollywood or Broadway could have created a more perfect match of player to role.

Think about a man with the self-discipline to collect almost thirty years worth of evidence BEFORE writing a book to explain what it all means. If I had been witness or student of these types of cases, starting at the age Elkins was when he started, I'd probably have tried to get on the Tonight Show with case # 1 and the front page of the New York Times with case # 2, writing my book about what it all meant after case # 3! What astounding long-term open-minded dedication to the collection of data before reaching any conclusions.

Yet Elkins's explanation of what this all means to him comes 15 years after dealing with his first of over 100 hypnotic regression experiments.

Only then, "Since I have observed over 100 people go through this process and have read millions of words of contactee literature, both published and unpublished, I believe that I am now in a position to select the highly correlative material from the masses of communications." And even then, the humility of "I believe that I am now in a position," rather than "pay attention, listen up, I'm the expert around here!"

At the start of the Ra contact, therefore, there may have been no other human being alive who was better equipped to represent humanity in the conversation. And he did so, not as Proclaimer or even Investigator, but merely as a humble Questioner: one who aspires to learn enough in order to be able to learn more, through asking a question that opens the door to a helpful answer.

My user name here is to honor and respect that attitude, and to aspire that some part of the graciousness of learning Don Elkins embodied will be present in my life as well. The user name is to remind me of those positive qualities and to inspire me to live up to that example as much as my life provides opportunities to do so.