in the following passage, Ra makes a distinction between the attitude and action of 'guiding' and that of 'teaching'.

Quote:9.3 Questioner: The healing exercises that you gave to us are [of] such a nature that it is best to concentrate on [a] particular exercise at a time. I would like to ask at this time what exercise I should concentrate on… possibly a little exercise change… should concentrate on [inaudible], say tonight?

Ra: I am Ra.

Again, to direct your judgment is an intrusion upon your space/time continuum distortion called future. To speak of past or present within our distortion/judgment limits is acceptable.

To guide rather than teach/learn is not acceptable to our distortion in regards to teach/learning.

We, instead, can suggest a process whereby each chooses the first of the exercises given in the order in which we gave them, which you, in your discernment, feel is not fully appreciated by your mind/body/spirit complex.

This is the proper choice, building from the foundation, making sure the ground is good for the building. We have assessed for you the intensity of this effort in terms of energy expended. You will take this in mind and be patient for we have not given a short or easy program of consciousness learn/teaching.

Life is so strange..always could not confirm where here is and what time at present what age ..is now ..

Only soul exist only spirit only thinking why am I here and who am I....
but I could not hear anything from air

We are the union the one as god maybe we had chosen to live on the earth before we birth when life is exist in this world memories had disappeared from last life …

why we designed such stupid life our selves and have to experience it without memories and so alone in as if there is no angles around us without any help

world will change in our expect way ?for huge amount of time dead and birth of birth and dead ?

is heaven like 4th or 6th perfect no sad no surfer from any thing

no hungry cold and health problems .why we are chosen to live on 3D earth as a wanderer as the god want to know what he is ?

The world of reality is just projection of spiritual world...

this thread is for w/e random questions u may have

according to Ra, is unity love or does unity only contain love?

i'll think of more later

I've been contemplating one specific piece in the Ra material lately, and I have two questions about it. Here is this piece:

daddy Ra Wrote:52.11 Questioner: Thank you. Just a little point that was bothering me of no real importance.

Well, is there then, from the point of view of an individual who wishes to follow the service-to-others path from our present position in third density, is there anything of importance other than disciplines of personality, knowledge of self, and strengthening of will?

Ra: I am Ra. This is technique. This is not the heart. Let us examine the heart of evolution.

Let us remember that we are all one. This is the great learning/teaching. In this unity lies love. This is a great learn/teaching. In this unity lies light. This is the fundamental teaching of all planes of existence in materialization. Unity, love, light, and joy; this is the heart of evolution of the spirit.

The second-ranking lessons are learn/taught in meditation and in service. At some point the mind/body/spirit complex is so smoothly activated and balanced by these central thoughts or distortions that the techniques you have mentioned become quite significant. However, the universe, its mystery unbroken, is one. Always begin and end in the Creator, not in technique.

A good portion of it, if not the majority of it, violates The Law of Responsibility, The Law of Confusion and other aspects of The Law of Freewill. This is due to Ra's desire to let Don do what he wishes with the material. While most of it was correctly and responsibly given to the channels involved, Don did not desire to apply The Laws of Freewill when publishing the material as any human would do when speaking and communicating to others.

This is possibly one of the most infringing materials that exist. While many may disagree, one simply has to contemplate the potentials of the information given to see my point. My life has been significantly changed by this material in ways more than just simple realizations of unity but its finer aspects of adepthood and other metaphysical realization.

This material is very dangerous as it is and I, for one, am glad it has not become a mainstream occult phenomenon. This is my belief/understanding.

I wish to add that you should use your own discernment with these statements. Do not take my advice on authority but rather contemplate what I suggest. Thank you.

What are some of the great ?'s in physics? What is the origin of mass? What is the nature of the arrow of time? The answers are simple. Consider if you will the human brain which is made up of billions of neurons. There are more connections in the human brain then their are stars in our galaxy. Our neurons communicate using electrical impulses. Those electrical impulses travel through the neuron and when they reach the next neuron there is a small gap between each neuron (synapse). At that point the electrical impulse converts into a chemical message to be passed to the next neuron where it will then be converted back to an electrical impulse. That is the nature of thought. That is conversion from energy to matter. That short gap energy is transformed in to multiple universes where your thought plays out all possible and probable outcomes (the many worlds interpretation). These thoughts or impulses also are traveling in a certain direction which explains why we have an arrow of time. The major point to understand is INFINITY and infinity is a hard concept to comprehend. To grasp infinity you must define that infinity as unity (singularity). The first thing in creation was infinity which is an oxymoron but you get the picture. The second thing to happen is infinity became aware. Now you can compare that concept to your creation the moment your fathers sperm fertilized your mothers egg and that moment of conception was your big bang. when that first cell began dividing your universe was expanding and yet it was not aware of itself yet. The moment the brain turned on so to speak, you the creator became aware and began to think. So I ask you, What is thought? What does it mean to take thought. Would thinking not be creating (experiencing) The process of thought is actually being played out in many multiverses that begin and end in a split second. Now think about the purpose of creation. Creation is all about energy and information. It takes energy to get information (experience). Picture a Black Hole consuming everything that nears it even light, so it is consuming all energy and information. Where is this energy and information going? Where does it end up? Could it be possible that it is what powers our cells and body. Could all that energy and info be what is coming out of the mitochondria in our cell. That is where infinity or intelligent infinity comes into play for the scale of the macrocosm to the microcosm is infinite it never ends. It flows like all energy and info flows in a torus shape. The conclusion to my theory is that yours and my ultimate goal is to fully grasp that we can travel the universe through meditation in which we are actually traveling through our thoughts. In fact that is all we are is a thought. The material universe is nothing but an illusion in which we carry out experiencing the possibilities and creating and sub creating for the intelligent infinity or the infinite consciousness. The fact is that we are all one thought in the creators mind and that makes us sub creators and that my friends is what is infinity is. Theory thought by Taylor Price

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

Ra says that 4th density is 100X more harmonious than 3D. Does this imply 100X more love is felt between everyone? Or does it mean that people get along and simply tolerate one another 100X more?

Hi

Recently i came across some evidence in the form of remote viewing evidence which supports what Ra says about the existence of Maldek, and how it exploded to form the asteroid belt (and equally significantly the Ra material explains this event too, although completely unrelated)

The remote viewing was done under "blind" conditions, which means the remote viewers didn't know what they where targets where before hand.
This study was done by the Farsight Institute http://www.farsight.org

The study was about what caused the asteroid belt, (and and the possibility of an exploding planet causing this)

Specific details about this study are here: http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteries/M...ect_2.html

Here are the sessions where the event is being remote viewed http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteries/M...sions.html

The results seem to indicate that this , which is exactly what Ra said in the Ra material,
here:


6.9 Questioner: Are there any people such as you find on Earth on any of the other planets in this solar system?
Ra: Do you request space/time present information or space/time continuum information?

6.10 Questioner: Both.
Ra: At one time/space, in what is your past, there was a population of third-density beings upon a planet which dwelt within your solar system. There are various names by which this planet has been named. The vibratory sound complex most usually used by your peoples is Maldek. These entities, destroying their planetary sphere, thus were forced to find room for themselves upon this third density which is the only one in your solar system at their time/space present which was hospitable and capable of offering the lessons necessary to decrease their mind/body/spirit distortions with respect to the Law of One.

10.1 Questioner: I think it would clarify things for us to go back to the time just before the transfer of souls from Maldek; see how the Law of One operated with respect to this transfer and why this was necessary. What happened to Maldek— or the people on Maldek to cause them to lose their planet? How long ago did this occur?
Ra: I am Ra. The peoples of Maldek had a civilization somewhat similar to that of the societal complex known to you as Atlantis in that it gained much technological information and used it without care for the preservation of their sphere following to a majority extent the complex of thought, ideas, and actions which you may associate with your so-called negative polarity or the service to self. This was, however, for the most part, couched in a sincere belief/thought structure which seemed to the perception of the mind/body complexes of this sphere to be positive and of service to others. The devastation that wracked their biosphere and caused its disintegration resulted from what you call war.





Saturn's Moon Iapetus, with dark patch from possible explosion, which further supports the theory.

I have affectionately accepted the term wanderer as I saw myself as someone not of the society but merely dwelling in it. But now I wonder why that term was chosen.

A wanderer seems to be someone with no purpose. For most of my life, I felt that I did not have any real sense of purpose, so maybe the term is appropriate. But the way Ra speaks of wanderers, there is a sense of purpose. Can anyone help straighten out this dichotomy?

One Love!

it's been my observation that one of the easiest concepts to lift from the Ra material is the STO/STS divide. This seems to be the easiest thing to latch onto, as its a very easy replacement for the Good/Evil dipole that most people implicity have.

but to me, it seems to do a disservice to the richness and the subtle conveyance of understanding that Ra offers in explaining the relative paths of 3d polarization.

if you look at the archetypes, it is the ongoing interplay and choice between light tendencies and dark tendencies; and these sort of culminate in archetype 22, that of the Choice. But is this Choice absolute? The most that we can say is that for positive harvest, a 51% light orientation is all that is required, and for a negative harvest a 5% light orientation is the benchmark.

it is very easy to identify oneself as 'positive', and not consider oneself as having negative tendencies at all. This is the cartoony type archetype of a do-gooder and a well-wisher. It is like the martyr archetype.

and likewise, a negative stereotype would be the tyrant or dictator of nations, someone totally self serving and incapable of having a conscience or acts of kindness and compassion. Another cartoony figurehead that is.

I think the best that can be said is that an individual might have positive orientations, and these can indeed be quite strong. Maybe strong enough for harvest, and strong enough to enable positive experience in 4th Density and higher positive planes.

but it would be an act of absolutism to think that a positive individual is incapable of separative acts and that they do not have negative tendencies latent at every step of the way.

and likewise, it would be a disservice to the Infinite Creator to think all negative-oriented individuals are incapable of acts of loving kindness and acceptance, as rare as those might be. In truth, those who polarise negative enough to harvest to 4D Negative can have a change of heart (quite literally), and switch to the positive path themselves by their own free will.

what I am trying to say I guess is that we can be so in love with the idea of the good/evil dipole that we inherited from our society that we just project this onto the STO/STS paths of polarization. When in truth, the concepts are so much richer and intertwined than they have been conveyed elsewhere.

so yes, there are indeed positive-leaning individuals in this world along with negative-leaning individuals.